Results 201 to 210 of about 440 (258)
Nonassertive Moral Abolitionism
Metaphilosophy, 2019 AbstractProponents of moral abolitionism, like Richard Garner, qualify their view as an “assertive” version of the position. They counsel moral realists and anti‐realists alike to accept moral error theory, abolish morality, and encourage others to abolish morality.
exaly +3 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Social Text, 2023
AbstractThis article proposes border abolitionism as both a political and an analytical framework for deepening critiques of border, migration, and asylum regimes worldwide. Abolitionist perspectives have been associated primarily with questions of criminalization and mass incarceration and thus articulated as a project of prison abolitionism ...
Tazzioli M., De Genova N.
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractThis article proposes border abolitionism as both a political and an analytical framework for deepening critiques of border, migration, and asylum regimes worldwide. Abolitionist perspectives have been associated primarily with questions of criminalization and mass incarceration and thus articulated as a project of prison abolitionism ...
Tazzioli M., De Genova N.
openaire +2 more sources
2018
The abolitionist movement launched the global human rights struggle in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, redefining the meaning of equality throughout the Atlantic world. In the twenty-first century, it remains a touchstone of democratic activism—a timeless example of mobilizing against injustice.
+5 more sources
The abolitionist movement launched the global human rights struggle in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, redefining the meaning of equality throughout the Atlantic world. In the twenty-first century, it remains a touchstone of democratic activism—a timeless example of mobilizing against injustice.
+5 more sources
Animal Abolitionism Meets Moral Abolitionism
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2013The use of other animals for human purposes is as contentious an issue as one is likely to find in ethics. And this is so not only because there are both passionate defenders and opponents of such use, but also because even among the latter there are adamant and diametric differences about the bases of their opposition.
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract In this chapter I examine “political” and “philosophical” cases for the abolition of punishment. I argue that far from being complementary, they are in fact significantly at odds with one another. Philosophical abolitionists typically focus on the kinds of intention that they take to be essential to punishment.
+4 more sources
+4 more sources
2020
This Chapter deals with the wider question of political influence and how anti-slavery activists engaged with politics. In the past, this topic has been dominated by studies of anti-slavery petitions. While recognising the importance of petitioning, this chapter looks at complementary forms of political protest, chief among them the pledging of ...
openaire +2 more sources
This Chapter deals with the wider question of political influence and how anti-slavery activists engaged with politics. In the past, this topic has been dominated by studies of anti-slavery petitions. While recognising the importance of petitioning, this chapter looks at complementary forms of political protest, chief among them the pledging of ...
openaire +2 more sources
Against moral judgment. The empirical case for moral abolitionism
Philosophical Explorations, 2021Hanno Sauer
exaly
Monstrosity, correctional healing, and the limits of penal abolitionism
Crime, Media, Culture, 2023Nicolas Carrier
exaly
War, Duties to Protect, and Military Abolitionism
Ethics and International Affairs, 2021Cécile Fabre
exaly