Results 1 to 10 of about 787 (290)
THE ECJ CASE-LAW ON THE ANNULMENT ACTION: GROUNDS, EFFECTS AND ILLEGALITY PLEA [PDF]
Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 2017 For practitioners in the field, but also for academicians it is equally important to know that there exists, under certain circumstances, the possibility of bringing an action for annulment, having as object the legally binding EU acts. All questions concerning the action for annulment have their significance in the theory and practice of the field ...
Augustin Fuerea
doaj +2 more sources
Annulment Actions and the V4: Taking Legislative Conflicts Before the CJEU
Politics and GovernanceThe EU member states have been using the action for annulment to challenge the legality of EU measures while pursuing a range of non-legal and essentially political motivations. This also holds for the V4 member states, which have also resorted to annulment actions to judicialize their legislative conflicts within the EU before the CJEU.
Márton Varjú +3 more
doaj +8 more sources
Peculiarities of the action for annulment against decisions of the EU decentralised agencies' Boards of Appeal [PDF]
Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu, 2023 There are ten EU decentralised agencies empowered to take decisions that are intended to produce legal effect vis-à-vis private persons in the context of regulating the internal market.
Slađana Mladenović
openalex +2 more sources
Studying Annulment Actions [PDF]
, 2019 This chapter presents the empirical strategy to study annulment actions. It relies on a combination of statistical methods and case study research. An original data set is compiled including all actions for annulment that the Court dealt with until 2015.
Christian Adam +3 more
openalex +2 more sources
Locus standi of non-privileged applicants in EU annulment actions [PDF]
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis, 2023 The aim of this paper is to analyze the circumstances under which private parties (natural and legal persons) can have a legal standing in annulment actions in EU Law. The limitations imposed on these private parties justifiably mark them as non-privileged applicants.
Đorđević-Aleksovski Sanja
openaire +2 more sources
Biocidal action of chlorhexidine is annulled by nicotinic acid [PDF]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1994 An analytical system comprising a bacterium and a protozoan was used to pinpoint the metabolic lesion whereby chlorhexidine (CLX) produced cell death. Nicotinic acid but not nicotinamide annulled the biocidal action of CLX. The results suggest that CLX may not permit bioconversion of nicotinamide to nicotinic acid to annul the growth inhibition induced
H. Baker +3 more
openalex +4 more sources
Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying perception and sentience in the neocortex. [PDF]
Front Comput NeurosciThe basis for computation in the brain is the quantum threshold of “soliton,” which accompanies the ion changes of the action potential, and the refractory membrane at convergences.
Johnson AS, Winlow W.
europepmc +2 more sources
Austria‘s Action for Annulment
On 17 June, Austrian Minister for Climate Action and Environment Leonore Gewessler voted in favor of the Nature Restoration Law in the EU Council of Ministers. Although a seemingly unspectacular thing for a minister to do, this set off a political scandal and constitutional dispute in Austria.
Luise Quaritsch, Niklas Nigl
openalex +3 more sources
The Dismissal of the Romanian Prosecutors Annulment Action
In the latest chapter of the EU rule of law saga, the General Court dismissed an annulment action lodged by an association of Romanian prosecutors, which challenged the termination of the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism in 2023, due to lack of direct concern. We argue that a too-narrow view of the issue does not reflect the rule of law situation
Benedetta Lobina, Candice Meera Maharaj
openalex +2 more sources
The ‘Aarhus Action for Annulment’ or ‘Climate Change Litigation beyond Plaumann?’
Nordic Journal of European LawThis article focuses on the so-called ‘Aarhus Action for Annulment’, which was introduced by the Aarhus Regulation in 2006 and revised in 2021. It raises the question of whether this mechanism truly offers a ‘Plaumann-free alternative’ to the traditional annulment route provided for under Art. 263(4) TFEU.
Sophie Dukarm
openalex +3 more sources