Results 231 to 240 of about 52,487 (253)

Appraising a tool for guideline appraisal (the AGREE II instrument)

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
The AGREE II instrument has 3 goals e to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), to provide a methodologic strategy for the development of guidelines, and to recommend how and what information should be reported in guidelines. Of these, the main purpose seems to be to assess guideline quality (i.e., ‘‘confidence that the potential ...
Antonio L, Dans, Leonila F, Dans
openaire   +2 more sources

Treatment of urinary incontinence: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines with the AGREE II instrument

International Urogynecology Journal, 2021
This systematic review evaluated the rigor of the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPG).The searched sources were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and specific databases of CPG. Reviewers, organized in triplicate and independently, selected the studies and assessed the quality of the guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines ...
Flávia Blaseck Sorrilha, Lauren Giustti Mazzei, Luciane Cruz Lopes, Silvio Barberato-Filho, Juliana Castro, Analaura Castro, Claudia Marcela Vélez, Cristiane de Cássia Bergamaschi   +7 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hypertension: Evaluation of Quality Using the AGREE II Instrument

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2016
Hypertension is an important public health challenge. The purpose of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is to provide explicit recommendations for clinical practice, reduce inadequate variations, optimize results, minimize risks, and promote cost-effective practice. Therefore, a highly methodological quality development process for CPGs is more likely
Xiaowei, Zhang, Kun, Zhao, Zhenggang, Bai, Jing, Yu, Feng, Bai   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Gesamtbewertung der Leitlinienqualität mit AGREE II: Wird das AGREE II-Instrument vollständig umgesetzt?

2015
Hintergrund: International wird das AGREE II-Instrument am häufigsten für die Bewertung der methodischen Qualität von Leitlinien genutzt. Es beinhaltet 23 Beurteilungskriterien in 6 voneinander unabhängigen Domänen. Zusätzlich sind 2 eigenständige Gesamtbewertungen[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL]
Hoffmann-Eßer, W, Neugebauer, E, Siering, U, Lampert, U, Rüther, A, Eikermann, M   +5 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Use of the AGREE II instrument to evaluate critical care practice guidelines addressing pharmacotherapy

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2022
AbstractRationale, Aims and ObjectivesClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been evaluated for reporting transparency and methodological quality in a number of studies in various disciplines, but few studies have focused on critical care and none on pharmacotherapy‐related guidelines specifically.
Dustin D. Linn, Robert D. Beckett, Andrew C. Faust   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Cow's milk allergy guidelines: a quality appraisal with the AGREE II instrument

Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2016
SummaryBackgroundThe appropriate diagnosis and management of cow's milk allergy (CMA) is challenging.ObjectiveTo systematically review the quality of the existing guidelines on CMA.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched from 2010 to November 2015.
M, Ruszczyński, A, Horvath, P, Dziechciarz, H, Szajewska   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Evaluating the Methodological Rigor and Recommendation Excellence of TAVR Guidelines: Insights from AGREE II and AGREE-REX Instruments

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a critical innovation for managing severe aortic stenosis, prompting the development of numerous clinical practice guidelines worldwide. This study systematically evaluates the guideline development methodologies of major international TAVR guidelines using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX ...
Jianguo Xu, Qingyong Zheng, Yating Cui, Junfei Wang, Yafei Xie, Lin Li, Ya Gao, Ming Liu, Yu Qin, Jiaxuan Sun, Kang Yi, Jinhui Tian   +11 more
openaire   +2 more sources

AGREE-II: Was tun bei abweichenden Bewertungen? Eine systematische Analyse aktueller Leitlinienbewertungen mit dem AGREE-II-Instrument

2016
Hintergrund: Das Leitlinienbewertungsinstrument AGREE-II umfasst 23 Einzelitems, eine Gesamtbewertung und eine Anwendungsempfehlung. Mindestens 2 Bewerter sollen die Bewertung unabhängig voneinander durchführen. Neben unterschiedlichen Einschätzungen können auch Fehlinterpretationen[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]
Siering, U, Hoffmann-Eßer, W, Neugebauer, E, Eikermann, M   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: a clinical practice guideline appraisal using AGREE II instrument

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2012
AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines providing diagnostic recommendations on pheochromocytoma (PHEO) using the new Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument and to promote the development of clinical guidelines.Research design and methodsWe searched ...
Juping, Yan, Jie, Min, Bo, Zhou
openaire   +2 more sources

Developing Evidence-Informed Recommendations for the Management of Parasport Classification Using the AGREE II Instrument

Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly
Sport administrators hold responsibility for implementing and managing parasport classification systems within national sport federations, yet they have called for guidance on how best to learn about and manage classification. This paper describes a consensus-based process, informed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and ...
Janet A. Lawson, Gwen Binsfield, Lorette Dupuis, Erin Latimer, Nancy Quinn, Darda Sales, Jessica Tinney, Amy E. Latimer-Cheung   +7 more
openaire   +2 more sources