Results 201 to 210 of about 17,266 (265)

How Are “Financial Balances” Financed? Wicksell, (Keynes) and the US Mainstream Don't Fit Today's Institutions; Kalecki, Triffin, and Minsky Got it Right

open access: yesMetroeconomica, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT The paper examines the financial balances of the US economy. Government is the main borrower and households and the foreign sector the main lenders. Business net lending is minimal. The balances and their underlying transactions contradict the loanable funds theory and its “global savings glut” variation.
Michalis Nikiforos, Lance Taylor
wiley   +1 more source

Tax Progressivity, Public Debt, and Growth in a Neo‐Kaleckian Model

open access: yesMetroeconomica, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT We develop a neo‐Kaleckian growth‐and‐distribution model featuring two classes of workers and a progressive income tax. Two fiscal closures are considered: balanced budgets and deficit financing via public debt. We study the responses to shocks, including changes in functional income distribution, and assess how tax progressivity alters demand
Tailiny Ventura   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Algebraic Approach to Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis. [PDF]

open access: yesPsychometrika
Fukasaku R   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Dynamical study of optical soliton solutions of time-fractional perturbed model in ultrafast optical fibers. [PDF]

open access: yesSci Rep
Ouahid L   +7 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Can we repudiate ontology altogether?

open access: yesNoûs, EarlyView.
Abstract Ontological nihilists repudiate ontology altogether, maintaining that ontological structure is an unnecessary addition to our theorizing. Recent defenses of the view involve a sophisticated combination of highly expressive but ontologically innocent languages combined with a metaphysics of features—non‐objectual, complete but modifiable states
Christopher J. Masterman
wiley   +1 more source

Aggregation and the Structure of Value

open access: yesNoûs, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Roughly, the view I call “Additivism” sums up value across time and people. Given some standard assumptions, I show that Additivism follows from two principles. The first says that how lives align in time cannot, in itself, matter. The second says, roughly, that a world cannot be better unless it is better within some period or another.
Weng Kin San
wiley   +1 more source

Free quantum computing. [PDF]

open access: yesProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Carette J   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy