Results 211 to 220 of about 66,283 (266)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Library Review, 1979
The title of Barry Hindess' book suggests yet another text which claims to set out the most useful methods for social science. It is nothing of the kind. Instead it is a brilliantly iconoclastic work which systematically sets about dismantling a great deal of sociology's claim to produce knowledge. For good measure Hindess throws in also major assaults
openaire +1 more source
The title of Barry Hindess' book suggests yet another text which claims to set out the most useful methods for social science. It is nothing of the kind. Instead it is a brilliantly iconoclastic work which systematically sets about dismantling a great deal of sociology's claim to produce knowledge. For good measure Hindess throws in also major assaults
openaire +1 more source
2016
Let us put forward a few preliminary theses. One of the most difficult aspects of writing about Althusser is rethinking his politics. This is indeed a paradoxical position, since, in one instance, his entire oeuvre is political. This said, there are no Althusserian political parties or political movements of any kind. In this regard, Althusserianism is
openaire +1 more source
Let us put forward a few preliminary theses. One of the most difficult aspects of writing about Althusser is rethinking his politics. This is indeed a paradoxical position, since, in one instance, his entire oeuvre is political. This said, there are no Althusserian political parties or political movements of any kind. In this regard, Althusserianism is
openaire +1 more source
The Handbook of Economic Methodology is a major multidisciplinary reference work on the developing field of economic methodology.
openaire +3 more sources
openaire +3 more sources
Gramsci and Althusser Encountering Machiavelli: Hegemony and/as New Practice of Politics
Jus Cogens, 2020Panagiotis Sotiris
semanticscholar +1 more source
Althusser Before Althusser: From Christianity to Communism
2016Louis Althusser insisted that philosophical work has no destination. It is rather an enterprise without beginning or end, and therefore without a point at which a philosopher has to arrive, or without a goal to achieve. A philosopher is an individual who jumps on a moving train “without knowing where he comes from (origin) or where he is going (goal).”
openaire +1 more source