Results 181 to 190 of about 21,310 (228)

WHO'S FOR AMNIOCENTESIS?

open access: yesThe Lancet, 1977
letterhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(77)91352-
Wyatt, Philip R.
core   +5 more sources

Amniocentesis

open access: yes, 1982
Panter, Gideon G.
core   +4 more sources

Early amniocentesis

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
Amniocentesis before 15 weeks has been introduced in many prenatal diagnosis centres. There are, however, major anatomical differences between the appearance of fetus at 15-16 weeks, when amniocentesis has normally been performed, and in the first and early second trimester.
S, Smidt-Jensen, K, Sundberg
openaire   +2 more sources

AMNIOCENTESIS

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1975
The indications, technique, and potential complications of the now commonly used obstetric procedure, amniocentesis, have been reviewed. Although amniocentesis is considered by many a routine and a very safe procedure, there are potential complications, especially for the fetus, but for the mother as well.
openaire   +3 more sources

COMPLICATIONS OF AMNIOCENTESIS

Medical Journal of Australia, 1962
A retrospective survey of 358 consecutive amniocenteses was undertaken. The incidence of failure was 37 (9.6%); most commonly this was due to oligohydramnios. A suprapubic tap was the most likely to be successful, but was accompanied by premature rupture of membranes in 3.8% of the cases.
openaire   +2 more sources

A Method of Amniocentesis

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1969
(1969). A Method of Amniocentesis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica: Vol. 48, No. sup3, pp. 147-149.
openaire   +2 more sources

HAZARDS OF AMNIOCENTESIS

The Lancet, 1979
Aubrey Milunsky   +2 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Transabdominal Amniocentesis

Science, 1957
H M, Parrish, F R, Lock, M E, Rountree
openaire   +3 more sources

Amniocentesis

Clinics in Perinatology, 1974
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy