Results 121 to 130 of about 580,661 (153)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

On antimagic directed graphs

Journal of Graph Theory, 2009
AbstractAn antimagic labeling of an undirected graph G with n vertices and m edges is a bijection from the set of edges of G to the integers {1, …, m} such that all n vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with that vertex. A graph is called antimagic if it admits an antimagic labeling.
Dan Hefetz   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Antimagic Labelings of Join Graphs

Mathematics in Computer Science, 2015
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Martin Baca   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

ON -ANTIMAGICNESS OF DISCONNECTED GRAPHS

Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 2016
A simple graph$G=(V,E)$admits an$H$-covering if every edge in$E$belongs to at least one subgraph of$G$isomorphic to a given graph$H$. Then the graph$G$is$(a,d)$-$H$-antimagic if there exists a bijection$f:V\cup E\rightarrow \{1,2,\ldots ,|V|+|E|\}$such that, for all subgraphs$H^{\prime }$of$G$isomorphic to$H$, the$H^{\prime }$-weights,$wt_{f}(H^{\prime
Bača, Martin   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

On graceful antimagic graphs

Aequationes mathematicae, 2022
Graceful labeling and antimagic labeling are two significant topics in the domain of graph labelings, with outstanding conjectures which still remain unsolved. In this paper, the authors combine these two concepts to define a new labeling, called graceful antimagic labelings. Graceful antimagicness of some families of trees, cycles, and nearly complete
Mohammed Ali Ahmed   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Local antimagic labeling of graphs

Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2018
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Xiaowei Yu   +4 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Antimagicness of Generalized Corona and Snowflake Graphs

Mathematics in Computer Science, 2014
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Jacqueline W. Daykin   +3 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Distance Antimagic Labelings of Graphs

2017
Let \(G=(V,E)\) be a graph of order n. Let \(f: V(G)\rightarrow \{1,2,\dots ,n\}\) be a bijection. For any vertex \(v \in V,\) the neighbor sum \(\sum \limits _{u\in N(v)}f(u)\) is called the weight of the vertex v and is denoted by w(v). If \(w(x) \ne w(y)\) for any two distinct vertices x and y, then f is called a distance antimagic labeling. A graph
Nainarraj Kamatchi   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Regular bipartite graphs are antimagic

Journal of Graph Theory, 2008
AbstractA labeling of a graph G is a bijection from E(G) to the set {1, 2,… |E(G)|}. A labeling is antimagic if for any distinct vertices u and v, the sum of the labels on edges incident to u is different from the sum of the labels on edges incident to v. We say a graph is antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling.
openaire   +1 more source

On Super Edge-Antimagicness of Circulant Graphs

Graphs and Combinatorics, 2015
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Martin Baca   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Antimagic labeling for subdivisions of graphs

Discrete Applied Mathematics
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy