Results 41 to 50 of about 580,661 (153)
Antimagic Labeling of Extension of Double Star [PDF]
An antimagic labeling of a simple, finite connected graph with p vertices and q edges is a bijection from the set of edges to the set of integers {1, 2, …, q} such that the vertex sums are pairwise distinct where the vertex sum at one vertex is the sum ...
Dr C. Meenakshi
doaj
On Antimagic Labeling for Some Families of Graphs
Antimagic labeling of a graph with vertices and edges is assigned the labels for its edges by some integers from the set , such that no two edges received the same label, and the weights of vertices of a graph are pairwise distinct.
Noor K. Shawkat, Mohammed A. Ahmed
doaj +1 more source
A note on incomplete regular tournaments with handicap two of order n≡8(mod 16) [PDF]
A \(d\)-handicap distance antimagic labeling of a graph \(G=(V,E)\) with \(n\) vertices is a bijection \(f:V\to \{1,2,\ldots ,n\}\) with the property that \(f(x_i)=i\) and the sequence of weights \(w(x_1),w(x_2),\ldots,w(x_n)\) (where \(w(x_i)=\sum_{x_i
Dalibor Froncek
doaj +1 more source
An undirected simple graph $G=(V,E)$ is called antimagic if there exists an injective function $f:E\rightarrow\{1,\dots,|E|\}$ such that $\sum_{e\in E(u)} f(e)\neq\sum_{e\in E(v)} f(e)$ for any pair of different nodes $u,v\in V$. In this note we prove — with a slight modification of an argument of Cranston et al. — that $k$-regular graphs are antimagic
Kristóf Bérczi +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
On Rainbow Vertex Antimagic Coloring of Graphs: A New Notion
All graph in this paper are simple, finite, and connected. Let be a labeling of a graph . The function is called antimagic rainbow edge labeling if for any two vertices and , all internal vertices in path have different weight, where the weight of ...
Marsidi Marsidi +3 more
doaj +1 more source
On local antimagic total labeling of complete graphs amalgamation [PDF]
Let \(G = (V,E)\) be a connected simple graph of order \(p\) and size \(q\). A graph \(G\) is called local antimagic (total) if \(G\) admits a local antimagic (total) labeling.
Gee-Choon Lau, Wai Chee Shiu
doaj +1 more source
Another Antimagic Decomposition of Generalized Peterzen Graph [PDF]
A decomposition of a graph P into a family Q consisting of isomorphic copies of a graph Q is (a,b)-Q-antimagic if there is a bijection φ:V(P)∪E(P)→{1,2,3,4…,v_P+e_P} such that for all subgraphs Q’ isomorphic to Q, the Q-weights φ(Q’ )=∑_(v∈V(Q^' ))▒φ ...
M. Irvan Septiar Musti +2 more
core +1 more source
PEWARNAAN TITIK TOTAL SUPER ANTI-AJAIB LOKAL PADA GRAF PETERSEN DIPERUMUM P(n,k) DENGAN k=1,2
The local antimagic total vertex labeling of graph G is a labeling that every vertices and edges label by natural number from 1 to such that every two adjacent vertices has different weights, where is The sum of a vertex label and the labels of all ...
Deddy Setyawan +4 more
doaj +1 more source
List-antimagic labeling of vertex-weighted graphs [PDF]
A graph $G$ is $k$-$weighted-list-antimagic$ if for any vertex weighting $\omega\colon V(G)\to\mathbb{R}$ and any list assignment $L\colon E(G)\to2^{\mathbb{R}}$ with $|L(e)|\geq |E(G)|+k$ there exists an edge labeling $f$ such that $f(e)\in L(e)$ for ...
Zhanar Berikkyzy +4 more
doaj +1 more source
An antimagic labeling of a graph G is a bijection f:E(G)→{1,…,|E(G)|} such that the weights w(x)=∑y∼xf(y) distinguish all vertices. A well-known conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel (1990) is that every connected graph other than K2 admits an antimagic ...
Tamaro Nadeak +5 more
core +1 more source

