Results 11 to 20 of about 35,383 (222)
Evaluation of Probability of Survival using APACHE II & TRISS Method in Orthopaedic Polytrauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Centre [PDF]
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2015 Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the ability of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method to evaluate chances of survival of orthopaedic polytrauma patients ...
Archit Agarwal +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 2017 Background and Aims: Outcome prediction of critically ill patients is an integral part of care in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scoring systems provide an objective means of mortality prediction in ...
Yeldho Eason Varghese +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, 2007 JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A performance de cada unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) precisa ser observada no contexto dos cuidados médicos, assim como pela instituição que ela faz parte.
Cristina Sayuri Nakano +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Lung India, 2021 Objectives: The objective is to determine utility of SAPS II, APACHE II, SAPS III, and APACHE IV scoring system in assessing outcome in mechanically ventilated patients in respiratory intensive care unit and to predict duration of mechanical ventilation (
Ravi Dosi +4 more
doaj +1 more source
APACHE II, data accuracy and outcome prediction [PDF]
Anaesthesia, 1998 From review of 122 intensive care charts, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II points were determined for eight physiological values. Using a strict interpretation of APACHE II criteria, an average of 20.6% of these points were higher and 6.7% lower than the points entered originally into an intensive care database.
D R, Goldhill, A, Sumner
openaire +2 more sources
Performance of APACHE IV in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients: Comparisons with APACHE II, SAPS 3, and MPM III [PDF]
Acute and Critical Care, 2018 Background In this study, we analyze the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, APACHE IV, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3, and Mortality Probability Model (MPM)0 III in order to determine which system ...
Mihye Ko +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2019 Objective: To evaluate the ability of new injury severity score (NISS), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), Glasgow coma scale (GCS), a combination of NISS and GCS, a combination of APACHE II and GCS, a combination of NISS and ...
Xiao-Yuan Ma +9 more
doaj +1 more source
PLoS ONE, 2015 ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE IV) in patients ...
XueZhong Xing +7 more
doaj +1 more source
Application Values of Six Scoring Systems in the Prognosis of Stroke Patients
Frontiers in Neurology, 2020 Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE; II and III), Chinese Stroke Scale (CSS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS), activities of daily living (ADL ...
Qun-Xi Li +8 more
doaj +1 more source
BMC Anesthesiology, 2020 Background There are several scores used for in-hospital mortality prediction in critical illness. Their application in a local scenario requires validation to ensure appropriate diagnostic accuracy.
Szymon Czajka +5 more
doaj +1 more source