Results 131 to 140 of about 7,377 (181)

Is It Worth Arguing? [PDF]

open access: possible, 2005
Argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) is an effective means of resolving conflicts in a multi-agent society. However, it consumes both time and computational resources for agents to generate, select and evaluate arguments. Furthermore, in many cases, argumentation is not the only means of resolving conflicts.
Nishan C. Karunatillake   +1 more
openaire   +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Implementation of Argus

ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 1987
Argus is a programming language and system developed to support the construction and execution of distributed programs. This paper describes the implementation of Argus, with particular emphasis on the way we implement atomic actions, because this is where Argus differs most from other implemented systems.
Barbara Liskov   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

Arguing on the computer

Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning learning 2005: the next 10 years! - CSCL '05, 2005
We describe a collaborative computer-based activity as a means of developing argumentive discourse skills in middle-school students. The rationale for use of this technology is that it heightens the opportunity, and indeed demand, for metacognitive reflection on the communication, relative to direct verbal exchange.
Deanna Kuhn, Wendy Goh
openaire   +2 more sources

Arguing Conformance

IEEE Software, 2012
Conformance to software standards plays an essential role in establishing confidence in high-integrity software systems. However, standards conformance suffers from uncertainty about its meaning for three reasons: because requirements of the standard must be interpreted to fit the specifics of the application; because standards can deliberately leave ...
Patrick J. Graydon   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source

Arguing with the cognitivists

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1996
A number of cognitivists have claimed that it is somehow illegitimate for those people who do not accept that cognitions are the only cause of human behavior to enter into debate on the issue. Their argument appears to be that it is not possible to develop an argument without making use of the sort of cognition described by Bandura [Bandura (1995 ...
openaire   +4 more sources

Arguing about arguing: a comment

Critical Policy Studies, 2013
This symposium of Critical Policy Studies shares the concern for systematic empirical evaluations of the extent to which arguing and deliberation are relevant for explaining outcomes in the real world of public policy. The articles contribute to a growing body of literature on the conditions under which deliberative practices matter in politics.
openaire   +1 more source

Arguing in Groups

2010
We have previously introduced the notion of arguing from experience, whereby agents debate a classification problem using arguments based on association rules mined “on the fly” from their individual datasets. In this paper we extend PISA, which allows for n agents to argue about cases which have n possible classifications.
Maya Wardeh   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy