Results 1 to 10 of about 3,599 (185)

True Allergies to Articaine: A 25-Year Analysis [PDF]

Dentistry Journal
Background: Although allergic reactions to amide local anesthetics (LA) are rare, it is important for medical professionals to be aware of their potential occurrence.
Frank Halling, Andreas Neff, Axel Meisgeier   +2 more
doaj   +4 more sources

Is Articaine More Potent than Mepivacaine for Use in Oral Surgery? [PDF]

eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research, 2018
Objectives: To investigate the potency and speed of action of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for maxillary teeth extractions. Material and Methods: Ninety-four patients, aged between 16 to 70 years old, were recruited in this study. Two regimens were
Giath Gazal
doaj   +2 more sources

Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double-blind crossover study

Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 2015
Aims: A crossover double-blind, randomized study was designed to explore the efficacy of 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline buccal infiltration and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline buccal infiltration following 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 ...
Giath Gazal, Abdullah Muteb Alharbi, Khalid HidayatAllah Al-Samadani, Mohammad Dib Kanaa   +3 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Mandibular Buccal Infiltration Compared To 2% Lignocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Children with Irreversible Pulpitis [PDF]

Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2015
Background: Lidocaine is the gold standard anaesthetic solution that has been used since its inception into dentistry till date. Around 80% of failures have been reported when lignocaine has been used for inferior alveolar nerve block in children and
Veena Arali, Mytri Prasanna
doaj   +2 more sources

Onset and duration of 2% lidocaine as inferior alveolar nerve block versus buccal/lingual infiltration of 4% articaine in mandibular second molars: Clinical trial study [PDF]

Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology, 2018
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The effectiveness of buccal or lingual (B/L) infiltration of 4% articaine as supplemental injection for pulp anesthesia of mandibular teeth was confirmed in previous studies.
Ehsan Esnaashari, Hengameh Bakhtiar, Bahareh Nazari, Shadi Mirzaei, Sohrab Tour-Savadkouhi   +4 more
doaj   +3 more sources

Comparison of the Effects of Articaine and Lidocaine Anesthetics on Blood Pressure after Maxillary Infiltration Technique: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial [PDF]

International Journal of Dentistry, 2021
Background. Many dental procedures begin with local anesthesia. Subsequent increase in blood pressure in healthy individuals commonly occurs and may be affected by several factors such as mental and physical stress, painful stimuli, and action of ...
Amirhossein Moaddabi, Parisa Soltani, Maryam Zamanzadeh, Kamran Nosrati, Mojtaba Mollamirzaei, Mariangela Cernera, Gianrico Spagnuolo   +6 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Comparative Evaluation of Alveolar Nerve Block with 2% Lidocaine–Epinephrine and 4% Articaine–Epinephrine Buccal Infiltration in Mandibular Premolar and Molar Region in Children: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial [PDF]

Children
Background/Objectives: Effective pain control in pediatric dentistry combines behavior management, local anesthesia, and follow-up care. This study compared the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 2% lidocaine and epinephrine versus ...
Jelena Komsic, Sanja Vujkov, Isidora Neskovic, Duska Blagojevic, Ana Tadic, Bojan Petrovic, Branislav Bajkin   +6 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Efficacy and safety of infiltration anesthesia with 4 % Articaine and block anesthesia with 2 % Lidocaine in the mandibular third molar extraction [PDF]

Journal of Dental Sciences
Background/Purpose: Articaine is a dental anesthetic that has been developed and widely used in recent years. This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy and safety of infiltration anesthesia with 4 % Articaine (with 1:100,000 epinephrine) and ...
Nai-Chih Huang, Hao-Hueng Chang, Chun-Pin Lin   +2 more
doaj   +2 more sources

A randomized control trial comparing buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with buccal and palatal infiltration of 2% lignocaine for the extraction of maxillary premolar teeth

Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 2019
Introduction: The use of articaine has been claimed to obviate the need for routine palatal local anesthetic injections on account of its better diffusion through soft and hard tissues as compared to other local anesthetic agents.
Vikas Sandilya, Neelam Noel Andrade, Paul C Mathai, Neha Aggarwal, Vyankatesh Sahu, Shibani Nerurkar   +5 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Buffered 4% Articaine Reduces Pain and Enhances Anesthesia in Maxillary Third Molar Extractions: A Randomized, Double-Blind Split-Mouth Study [PDF]

Biomedicines
Background/Objectives: Buffered local anesthetics are suggested to enhance patient comfort and anesthetic efficacy during dental procedures. However, their advantages over non-buffered solutions in maxillary third molar extractions remain under ...
Henning Staedt, Victor Palarie, Diana Heimes, Peter Ottl, Shengchi Fan, Peer W. Kämmerer   +5 more
doaj   +2 more sources