Results 31 to 40 of about 3,599 (185)

Lingual supplementation may not be required after articaine buccal infiltration anesthesia for lower molar extraction: A clinical comparative study

Journal of Oral Research, 2022
Purpose: To investigate the anesthetic effectiveness of buccal infiltration (BI) versus buccal plus lingual infiltration (BI+LI) of 4% articaine for intra-alveolar extraction of erupted mandibular molar teeth Material and Methods: Eighty patients were ...
Omer Waleed Majid, Zaid Abdulazeez Muhammad   +1 more
doaj   +1 more source

Anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lignocaine as supplementary buccal infiltration after failed inferior alveolar nerve block – A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Endodontology, 2023
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine as supplementary buccal infiltration after failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Pradeeba Anandi Jeya Goutham, Arasappan Rajakumaran, Manigandan Kuzhanchinathan, Lakshmi Balaji   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions

Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017
Objective: To investigate the speed of action and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for upper teeth extractions. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients were included in the articaine 4% group, and 45 in the mepivacaine 2 ...
Giath Gazal, Rashdan Alharbi, Wamiq Musheer Fareed, Esam Omar, Albraa Badr Alolayan, Hassan Al-Zoubi, Ahmad A Alnazzawi   +6 more
doaj   +1 more source

Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and articaine used for buccal infiltration and supplemental palatinal infiltration anesthesia in maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized study. [PDF]

BMC Oral Health
Kolay D, Kırıcı D.
europepmc   +3 more sources

Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth

Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 2020
Objective: To compare the anesthetic performances of 3% prilocaine and 4% articaine when used for the extraction of the maxillary teeth. Materials and Methods: Ninety-five patients, aged between 16 and 70 years, were included in this study. Patients were
Giath Gazal
doaj   +1 more source

Articaine

, 2006
europepmc   +2 more sources

Efficacy of QuickSleeper Intraosseous Injection of 4% Articaine in Mandibular First Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [PDF]

Anesth Prog
Vatankhah M, Dianat O, Zargar N, Bejestani SG, Baghban AA, Shojaeian S.   +5 more
europepmc   +3 more sources

Efficacy and safety of articaine in 3-year-old children for dental procedures: a protocol for a clinical randomised control trial in Saudi Arabia

BMJ Open, 2023
Introduction Despite the wide use of articaine in paediatric dentistry owing to its proven effectiveness and safety, articaine application in children <4 years remains controversial due to a lack of data on the use of articaine in very young children.
Murad Alrashdi, Atyaf Alhunti, Asya Almansour   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Swiss paediatric dentists' preferences and experience on the use of articaine and other local/topical anaesthetics [PDF]

, 2023
Blend Hamza
openalex   +2 more sources

Anaesthetic efficacy of lidocaine and articaine in inferior alveolar nerve block combined with buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis

Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 2021
Purpose: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was conducted to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) combined with ...
Shrimanikandan Ayappa Gandhi, Sambarta Das, Abhisek Das, Yoshaskam Agnihotri, Rajanna Venkatraman Mohan, Venkata Ramanan Dasu Subramanian   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source