Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17) [PDF]
The judgement of EU Court of Justice in response to the request for a preliminary ruling by the Polish Supreme Court confirms that the principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must ...
Mario Libertini
doaj +1 more source
The Judicial Review of the Standard of Proof in Cartel Cases:Raising the Bar for the Croatian Competition AuthorityCase comment to the Judgment of the Constitutional Courtof the Republic of Croatia No. U-III-2791/2016 of 1 February 2018(Sokol Marić d.o.o.) [PDF]
The Security agencies case represents another example of the procedural diversity among Member States in applying national competition rules that mirror Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
Alexandr Svetlicinii
doaj +1 more source
Developments in the Case Law of the EU Courts in Competition Law in 2016
In this report we intend to briefly describe some of the most relevant cases of the General Court and the Court of Justice adopted during 2016 in Competition Law.
Catarina Vieira Peres
doaj +1 more source
Hearing Officers in competition proceedings conducted by the European Commission for the implementation of Article 101 and 102 TFEU [PDF]
The article analyzes the role played by the Hearing Officer in competition proceedings conducted by the European Commission to implement Article 101 and 102 TFEU.
Justyna Kownacka
doaj +1 more source
The subject of this article is to analyze the meaning of the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality in the light of the provisions of primary and secondary European Union law and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union,
Monika Patrycja Bator-Bryła
doaj +1 more source
Market power and gatekeepers: complements or substitutes?
Although they are distinctive instruments, Article 102 TFEU and the Digital Markets Act (DMA) commonly target undertakings with high degrees of economic power.
Florence Thepot
doaj +1 more source
This case comment analyses the European Commission’s 2024 decision fining Apple €1.84 billion for imposing anti-steering provisions on music streaming apps in the App Store.
Arletta M. Gorecka
doaj +1 more source
Rebates under EU Competition Law after the 2017 Intel Judgment: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
On 6 September 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its long-awaited Intel judgment. The European Commission had accused Intel of inducing customer loyalty and thus foreclosing the relevant market for its competitors through (i) a ...
Viktoria H.S.E. Robertson
doaj +1 more source
Intel, leveraging rebates and the goals of Article 102 TFEU [PDF]
This paper reviews the 2014 Intel judgment of the General Court of the EU in relation to exclusivity rebates given by dominant firms. It distinguishes between the positive issue – ie the legal standard currently applicable to the assessment of dominant firms' rebates – and the prospective discussion – ie the legal standard that should optimally apply ...
openaire +2 more sources
Abstract The EU's Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) aims to secure supply chains for the green and digital transitions through the designation of ‘strategic projects’ and accelerated permitting procedures. While it does not formally amend EU environmental legislation, it reshapes the conditions under which environmental assessment is applied in ...
Nicolò Andreotti
wiley +1 more source

