Results 31 to 40 of about 146,677,427 (126)
Article 11 TFEU and Environmental Rights
, 2018 This paper explores whether Article 11 TFEU, requiring that ‘[e]nvironmental protection requirements must be integrated into the definition and implementation of the Union’s policies and activities, in particular with a view to promoting sustainable ...
Nowag, Julian
core +1 more source
Boosting sustainable technology through the new EU competition policy
European Law Journal, Volume 31, Issue 3, Page 227-249, October 2025.Abstract EU antitrust is at the crossroads. It faces calls to be more supportive of corporate sustainability initiatives and, since the publication of the Draghi Report, increased pressure not to stand in the way of the global competitiveness of European industries.
Sandra Marco Colino
wiley +1 more source
A Smithian Political Economy Approach for the Competition Law of the 21st Century
The Modern Law Review, Volume 88, Issue 4, Page 712-768, July 2025.This study aims to show how a Smithian political economy approach could assist competition law in addressing the challenges of the 21st‐century economy. We revisit Smith's Wealth of Nations to provide a more nuanced understanding of his views, contrasting them with the prevailing libertarian interpretation called here ‘Chicago Smith’.
Stavros Makris
wiley +1 more source
Review of European, Comparative &International Environmental Law, Volume 34, Issue 2, Page 379-393, July 2025.Abstract Despite the European Union's strong commitment to transparent and participatory governance, the preparation of its position for international climate negotiations is not particularly transparent or open to civil society participation. The situation could be said to reflect a broader paradigm of secrecy in EU policy‐ and law‐making.
Tuula Honkonen
wiley +1 more source
The ESSU: crossing the constitutional boundaries of Article 114 TFEU? [PDF]
This blogpost argues that the proposed European Start-Up and Scale-Up Company’s legal basis is erroneous. As the proposal fails to harmonise, it cannot be adopted under Article 114 TFEU.
de Zwart, Meriëlle; id_orcid +1 more
core +2 more sources
Against the veto solution in cross‐border avoidance law
International Insolvency Review, Volume 34, Issue 2, Page 364-389, Summer 2025.Abstract UNCITRAL is striving to determine the law applicable to cross‐border insolvency avoidances. In principle, this should be the lex fori concursus. However, both Regulation (EU) 2015/848 and the laws of some European countries adopt a combination of lex fori concursus and lex causae called the ‘veto solution’.
Renato Mangano
wiley +1 more source
Art.267 TFEU preliminary rulings: an overview of EU and national case-law
, 2012 Featured article on TFEU preliminary rulings including an overview of EU and national case ...
Rodger, Barry
core +2 more sources
The European Union's Global Health Actorness: A Research Agenda for a New Age of Pandemics
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 63, Issue 3, Page 1008-1021, May 2025.Abstract Whilst the European Union's (EU's) response to health emergencies has historically been subpar, some suggest that it emerged from COVID‐19 as a stronger global health actor. This prompts two interrelated questions: how have International Relations scholars conceptualised and assessed EU ‘actorness’ in the all‐too‐often neglected field of ...
Óscar Fernández
wiley +1 more source
Defining and Operationalising Defiant Non‐Compliance in the EU: The Rule of Law Case
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 63, Issue 3, Page 964-986, May 2025.Abstract Existing literature often attributes non‐compliance to either a lack of resources or implementation costs. However, the rule of law crises in Hungary and Poland present a different picture: a deliberate strategy aimed at not complying with EU enforcement actions.
Carlos Closa, Gisela Hernández
wiley +1 more source
Deposit return schemes of EU Member States and the EU's internal market
Review of European, Comparative &International Environmental Law, Volume 34, Issue 1, Page 101-108, April 2025.Abstract Deposit return (DR) schemes on drinks containers have long been in place in certain EU Member States. Consumers are charged a deposit per container at the point of purchase, which they can later get back when they return the container after consuming its contents.
Graham Butler
wiley +1 more source