Results 1 to 10 of about 73,302,275 (170)

Limitations on Parallel Import of Medicinal Products: Comments in the Context of the Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-602/19 Kohlpharma

Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 2021
The judgement in case C-602/19 Kohlpharma is another decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union, which sets legal framework for marketing medicinal products from parallel import.
Jarosław Dudzik
doaj   +3 more sources

Discrimination Disguised: The Market Access Test of Article 34 TFEU

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
The European Court of Justice has, at times, utilized a market access test to determine whether a national measure has equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction (MEQR) on imports within the meaning of Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Lynndon Groff
openaire   +2 more sources

Case C-171/11 Fra.bo: Horizontal Effect of Article 34 TFEU

European Law Blog, 2012
Benedikt Pirker
openaire   +2 more sources

'Facilitating infringements' of article 34 TFEU and the territorial nature of green electricity support schemes: Case C-573/12 Ålands Vindkraft AB v Energimyndigheten

European Law Blog, 2014
L. Ankersmit
openaire   +2 more sources

Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2021 in Case C‑488/20, Delfarma SP. Z o.o. v. Prezes Urzędu Rejestracji Produktów Leczniczych, Wyrobów Medycznych i Produktów Biobójczych

Review of European and Comparative Law, 2023
Medicinal products are a special type of goods due to their importance for human health and life, and their trade is generally under the scope of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code
Katarzyna Małgorzata Mełgieś
doaj   +1 more source

What Keck and Mithouard Should Have Said: It Could Have Been So Simple

European Papers, 2023
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(1), 385-391 | What Should Have Said | (Abstract) This rewriting of Keck and Mithouard maintains the basic underlying philosophy of the Keck judgment but dispenses with the ...
Stefan Enchelmaier
doaj   +1 more source

What Keck and Mithouard Should Have Said: Preventing Substantial Barriers to Market Access

European Papers, 2023
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(1), 363-372 | What Should Have Said | (Abstract) This rewriting of Keck and Mithouard is based on three categories of measures having equivalent effect: (1) national measures
Niklas Nachtnebel, Antoine Langrée, Fraser Rodger, Niamh Nic Shuibhne   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Introduction: What Keck and Mithouard Actually Said – And Its Legacy

European Papers, 2023
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(1), 353-362 | What Should Have Said | (Abstract) The European Court of Justice's judgment in Keck and Mithouard is one of the crucial judgments in the development of the free
Justin Lindeboom
doaj   +1 more source

Preface: Rewriting Landmark Judgments of the European Court of Justice: A New Project for European Papers and a New Way of ‘Doing EU Law’

European Papers, 2023
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(1), 349-352 | What Should Have Said | (Abstract) This preface to the new series What ...
Justin Lindeboom
doaj   +1 more source

What Keck and Mithouard Should Have Said: 'Steady as She Goes, Left Hand Down a Bit?'

European Papers, 2023
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2023 8(1), 393-403 | What Should Have Said | (Abstract) This rewriting of Keck and Mithouard unequivocally states that the French prohibition on sale at a loss is a measure having ...
Laurence Gormley
doaj   +1 more source