Results 51 to 60 of about 145,852,437 (199)
Healthcare decision‐making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) has long been understood as comprising two distinct, sequential decisions. First, a clinical decision about what treatment options are available. Second, a best interests decision about which (if any) of these options to proceed with.
Jordan A. Parsons, Alex Cisneros
wiley +1 more source
Execution of court decisions in Ukraine: reforming the system in terms of the right to a fair trial
The article addresses the Ukrainian model of executive proceedings (which was recently updated as a result of constitutional reform in the justice sector) through the prism of the right to a fair trial, guaranteed by paragraph 1 of Art.
Татьяна Андреевна Цувина
doaj +1 more source
Rank, Degrading Treatment, and the Italy‐Albania Agreement
ABSTRACT In November 2023, Italy signed a five‐year agreement with Albania to transfer asylum seekers intercepted in international waters by Italian vessels to Italian‐run detention centres in Albania for asylum processing and deportation. The agreement has been controversial and raises several human rights issues.
Jamal Barnes, Obed Adonteng‐Kissi
wiley +1 more source
Enforcement under the Brussels Convention: Procedural public policy and the influence of Article 6 ECHR [PDF]
Although it must be held that it is contrary to the scheme of the recognition and enforcement provisions of the Brussels Convention for one Member State to review or “sec-ond guess” compliance with Article 6 ECHR by the courts of another Member State, we
Kramer, X.E. (Xandra)
core +1 more source
Execution of court decisions in terms of the right to a fair trial
The article addresses the Ukrainian model of executive proceedings (which was recently updated as a result of constitutional reform in the justice sector) through the prism of the right to a fair trial, guaranteed by paragraph 1 of Art.
Тетяна Андріївна Цувіна
doaj +1 more source
Bioethics and Medical Litigation in France: An Exploratory Study
ABSTRACT Aims and Objectives Medical litigation is a matter of particular concern for hospitals. We decided to examine whether bioethics might offer additional insights into these disputes. Method We conducted a highly exploratory and descriptive study in empirical bioethics, relying exclusively on a sample of scientific articles addressing medical ...
Rania Nader +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Guaranteeing the Right to Defense in Light of the Provisions of International Treaties Specialized in Human Rights and ECHR Jurisprudence [PDF]
The right to defense as a social value is necessary for any social environment, and the arising of its elements during various stages of civilization has witnessed a visible progress, considering that nowadays the acknowledgement of the right to defense ...
Trocan, Laura Magdalena
core
Fitness to Stand Trial: A General Principle of European Criminal Law?
This article reflects on whether the principle of fitness to stand trial, which follows from Article 6 ECHR, should be incorporated as a general principle in European criminal law.
Liselotte van den Anker +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Is there a ‘right’ to use Welsh in prison?
Abstract The use of the Welsh language is generally understood as a ‘right’ in contemporary Wales. While this right is often lauded as one of Welsh devolution's defining achievements, the efficacy of current protections is contested. This article contributes to the debate by focusing on the prison context, where the question of Welsh language rights is
GREGORY DAVIES, ROBERT JONES
wiley +1 more source
The ‘right to (cross)-examination’ is regulated in Article 6(3)(d) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). However, this right is not absolute and can, under circumstances, be limited.
Candan Yilmaz
doaj +1 more source

