Results 241 to 250 of about 295,977 (302)
Potential Role of Mosses in Evaluating Airborne Microplastic Deposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. [PDF]
Bargagli R, Rota E.
europepmc +1 more source
Increased contributions of climate-driven wildfires to nitrogen deposition in the United States. [PDF]
Campbell PC +9 more
europepmc +1 more source
Correction to: Dissecting the contributions of organic nitrogen aerosols to global atmospheric nitrogen deposition and implications for ecosystems. [PDF]
Li Y +12 more
europepmc +1 more source
Atmospherically deposited elemental mercury drives evasion of mercury from the ocean and freshwaters. [PDF]
Fu X +8 more
europepmc +1 more source
Atmospheric microplastic emissions from land and ocean. [PDF]
Evangelou I, Bucci S, Stohl A.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition
Science, 1997David A. Wedin and David Tilman (Reports, 6 Dec., p 1720 ) show that increased nitrogen inputs to terrestrial ecosystems might cause smaller increases in the capacity of those ecosystems to store carbon than expected.
Bruce A. Hungate +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 1999
The35S content in atmospheric deposition, aerosol and rain water was determined about every 10 days for a year with7Be,32P and some stable elements. Average35S concentrations were 110 mBq·m−2·d−1 for atmospheric deposition, 0.078 mBq·m−3 for aerosol in surface air and 45 mBq·l−1 for rain water.
S. Osaki +4 more
openaire +1 more source
The35S content in atmospheric deposition, aerosol and rain water was determined about every 10 days for a year with7Be,32P and some stable elements. Average35S concentrations were 110 mBq·m−2·d−1 for atmospheric deposition, 0.078 mBq·m−3 for aerosol in surface air and 45 mBq·l−1 for rain water.
S. Osaki +4 more
openaire +1 more source
Atmospheric Deposition and Forest Decline
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 1986This paper discusses the economic implications of alternative scientific explanations of observed forest decline. The various explanations can be grouped into two categories. One category posits direct damage to the forest canopy that is reversible. The other category posits indirect damage via soil quality changes that may be irreversible or slow to ...
Thomas D. Crocker, Bruce A. Forster
openaire +1 more source

