Results 231 to 240 of about 195,981 (325)
A commentary on Bonanno and Westphal's (2024) three axioms of resilience: Application to military contexts. [PDF]
J Trauma StressWild J +11 more
europepmc +1 more source
UNWARRANTED CONFIDENCE: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE POVERTY OF ANTI‐REALISM
History and Theory, EarlyView.ABSTRACT The Poverty of Anti‐Realism: Critical Perspectives on Postmodernist Philosophy of History, edited by Tor Egil Førland and Branko Mitrović, celebrates the new dawn of historical realism, which it claims supersedes the erroneous and harmful anti‐realism.
Jouni‐Matti Kuukkanen
wiley +1 more source
Entropic Probability and Context States. [PDF]
Entropy (Basel)Schumacher B, Westmoreland MD.
europepmc +1 more source
Problematising ‘Vulnerability’ in Women's Prisons
The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, EarlyView.ABSTRACT ‘Vulnerability’ is a commonly used but little understood term in the field of social policy and beyond. The refocusing of our criminal justice system around notions of ‘vulnerability’ has had wide‐reaching consequences which often escape both academic and political attention.
Sarah Waite, Danica Darley
wiley +1 more source
Accounting for population structure in genomic prediction of strawberry sweetness at a global scale. [PDF]
Sci RepFikere M +17 more
europepmc +1 more source
Limit Orders and Knightian Uncertainty
International Economic Review, EarlyView.ABSTRACT A wide variety of financial instruments allows risk‐averse traders to reduce their exposure to risk. This raises the question of what financial instruments allow ambiguity‐averse traders to reduce their exposure to ambiguity. We show in this paper that price‐contingent orders, such as limit orders, are sufficient: In a two‐period trading model,
Michael Greinecker, Christoph Kuzmics
wiley +1 more source
Evaluating Allocations of Opportunities
International Economic Review, EarlyView.ABSTRACT This paper provides a robust criterion for comparing lists of probability distributions—interpreted as allocations of opportunities—faced by different social groups. We axiomatically argue in favor of comparing those lists of probability distributions on the basis of a uniform—among groups—valuation of their expected utility.
Francesco Andreoli +3 more
wiley +1 more source