Results 1 to 10 of about 18 (16)

Some remarks about Mackey convergence

open access: yesInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 1995
In this paper, we examine Mackey convergence with respect to K-convergence and bornological (Hausdorff locally convex) spaces. In particular, we prove that: Mackey convergence and local completeness imply property K; there are spaces having K- convergent
Józef Burzyk, Thomas E. Gilsdorf
doaj   +2 more sources

Fast complete locally convex linear topological spaces

open access: yesInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 1986
This is a study of relationship between the concepts of Mackey, ultrabornological, bornological, barrelled, and infrabarrelled spaces and the concept of fast completeness. An example of a fast complete but not sequentially complete space is presented.
Carlos Bosch   +2 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Barrelled and Bornological Function Spaces

open access: yesJournal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2000
A subset \(K\) of a completely regular topological space \(Y\) is \(t\)-bounded if \(f(K)\) is a bounded subset of \(\mathbb{R}\) for every real continuous function \(f\) on \(Y\). Let \(X\) be a completely regular topological space. \(\nu X\) is the real-compactification of \(X\).
Dontchev, Julian   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

A class of bornological barrelled spaces which are not ultrabornological

open access: yesMathematische Annalen, 1971
N. Bourbaki, [1, p. 35], notices that it is not known if every bornological barrelled space is ultrabornological. In this paper we prove that if E is the topological product of an infinite family of bornological barrelled spaces, of non-zero dimension, there exists an infinite number of bornological barrelled subspaces ofE, which are not ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Analysis of a problem of Raikov with applications to barreled and bornological spaces

open access: yesJournal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 2011
Several additive categories arising in applications fail to be abelian but are only semi-abelian, that is, the morphism \(\bar{f}: \mathrm{coim} f \to \mathrm{im} f \) in the canonical decomposition \(f: A\to \mathrm{coim} f \to \mathrm{im} f \to B\) is as well a mono- as an epimorphism but in general not invertible.
openaire   +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Subspaces of Bornological and Quasibarrelled Spaces

Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 1973
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy