Results 21 to 30 of about 101 (98)
UNWARRANTED CONFIDENCE: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE POVERTY OF ANTI‐REALISM
ABSTRACT The Poverty of Anti‐Realism: Critical Perspectives on Postmodernist Philosophy of History, edited by Tor Egil Førland and Branko Mitrović, celebrates the new dawn of historical realism, which it claims supersedes the erroneous and harmful anti‐realism.
Jouni‐Matti Kuukkanen
wiley +1 more source
Van Frasssen, Everett, and the critique of the copenhagem view of measurement
Bas van Fraassen advocates a “Copenhagen variant” of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. However, he believes that the Copenhagen approach to measurement is not fully satisfactory, since it seems to rule out the possibility of providing a ...
Stefano Osnaghi
doaj +1 more source
The bayesian and the abductivist
Abstract A major open question in the borderlands between epistemology and philosophy of science concerns whether Bayesian updating and abductive inference are compatible. Some philosophers—most influentially Bas van Fraassen—have argued that they are not.
Mattias Skipper, Olav Benjamin Vassend
wiley +1 more source
O empirismo construtivo e o argumento de Musgrave: um problema ou um pseudoproblema?
Resumo Em 1985, Alan Musgrave levantou uma séria objeção contra a possibilidade, por parte de um empirista construtivo, de traçar de maneira coerente a distinção - crucial para ele - entre observáveis e inobserváveis.
Alessio Gava
doaj +1 more source
Neste quarto fascículo regular de 2018 da revista Trans/Form/Ação, contamos com dez contribuições inéditas focadas nos pensamentos moderno e contemporâneo, na lógica e na filosofia da ciência.
Andrey Ivanov
doaj +1 more source
Epistemic injustice and the “Nature of Science”
Abstract Scientists and science educators have argued that learners (students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers) should understand knowledge construction in science, in addition to figuring out disciplinary core ideas. Given this goal, some science education scholars created a construct called the “Nature of Science” (NOS), which aims to ...
David Stroupe +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Abstract Some philosophical pluralists argue that a top‐down and a bottom‐up approach serve as equally justified methods for engaging in ontological inquiry. In the top‐down approach, we start with an analysis of theory and extrapolate from there to the world.
Ragnar van der Merwe
wiley +1 more source
Milking a spherical cow: Toy models in neuroscience
Highly idealised models have long played a role in physics, valued not for their empirical accuracy but for their ability to clarify conceptual puzzles, foster tool development, and suggest new directions. We argue that the theoretical development of neuroscience could likewise benefit from such a strategy. After briefly reviewing the use of toy models
Randall D. Beer +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Science-based Metaphysics: On Some Recent Anti-metaphysical Claims
This paper focuses on the debate concerning whether and, if at all, in what way metaphysics should be accepted alongside science. It examines some recent objections levelled, among others, by Bas Van Fraassen against metaphysics as an intelligible and ...
Matteo Morganti
doaj +1 more source
Indifference, Indeterminacy, and the Uncertainty Argument for Saving Identified Lives
ABSTRACT In some cases where we are faced with a decision of whether to prioritize identified lives over statistical lives, we have no basis for assigning specific probabilities to possible outcomes. Is there any reason to prioritize either statistical or identified lives in such cases?
Eric Gilbertson
wiley +1 more source

