Results 111 to 120 of about 192 (133)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The Belgian Constitution of 1831 is often described as ‘liberal’ because of the radical implementation of various aspects of ‘modern constitutionalism’, particularly of some fundamental rights. However, such a view does not take into account that the liberals of the early nineteenth century were heirs to the revolutionary tradition of the late ...
van den Berg, Peter +1 more
core +4 more sources
A pragmatic conservatism. Montesquieu and the framing of the Belgian constitution (1830–1831)
History of European Ideas, 2002In 1830, members of the Belgian National Congress asserted that they would not attempt to create an ideal constitution. Rather, they wanted to frame a constitution which would take the existing order into account, which would be adapted to Belgian manners and customs.
exaly +2 more sources
Constituent power in the Belgian National Congress and the 1831 Belgian Constitution
2021Christophe Maes, Bas Leijssenaar
exaly +2 more sources
The Belgian Constitution of 1831. History, Ideologies, Sovereignty /La Costituzione belga del 1831: storia, ideologie, sovranità, hg. v. Brecht Deseure/Raf Geenens/Christophe Maes/Stefan Sottiaux et al. (= Journal of Constitutional History/Giornale di Storia Costituzionale 35) [PDF]
peer reviewedLa recension porte sur une partie du Journal of Constitutional History qui correspond à une étude réalisée à la KUL. Suivant une approche multidisciplinaire, cette étude revient sur les origines de la Constitution belge.
Jousten, Andy
openaire +2 more sources
Giornale di storia costituzionale, 2018
The Belgian Constitution of 1831 is known as a liberal constitution, and with good reason. It introduced several freedoms – of religion, education and association, among others – that under the Dutch king William I (1815-1830) had been more or less strongly limited. As a result, it left social forces free to organise themselves.
openaire +2 more sources
The Belgian Constitution of 1831 is known as a liberal constitution, and with good reason. It introduced several freedoms – of religion, education and association, among others – that under the Dutch king William I (1815-1830) had been more or less strongly limited. As a result, it left social forces free to organise themselves.
openaire +2 more sources

