Results 101 to 110 of about 2,856 (190)
Bell's Theorem proved that one cannot in general reproduce the results of quantum theory with a classical, deterministic local model. However, Einstein originally considered the case where one could define an 'element of reality', namely for the much simpler case where one could predict with certainty a definite outcome for an experiment.
Greenberger, Daniel M. +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Dichotomic Functions and Bell’s Theorems [PDF]
4 pages, plain.tex, to appear in the Proceedings of the II Int.
openaire +2 more sources
Discretization of the Bloch sphere, fractal invariant sets and Bell's theorem. [PDF]
Palmer TN.
europepmc +1 more source
Classical Information and Collapse in Wigner's Friend Setups. [PDF]
Baumann V.
europepmc +1 more source
Locality, Realism, Ergodicity and Randomness in Bell's Experiment. [PDF]
Hnilo AA.
europepmc +1 more source
The structure of κ-maximal cofinitary groups. [PDF]
Fischer V, Switzer CB.
europepmc +1 more source
Secret Sides of Bell’s Theorem
In 1935 Albert Einstein together with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a paper in which they outlined how a ‘proper’ fundamental theory of nature should look like [1]. The EPR programme required completeness (“In a complete theory there is an element corresponding to each element of reality”), locality (“The real factual situation of the
openaire +2 more sources
Superdeterminism without Conspiracy
Superdeterminism—where the Measurement Independence assumption in Bell’s Theorem is violated—is frequently assumed to imply implausibly conspiratorial correlations between properties λ of particles being measured and measurement settings x and y.
Tim Palmer
doaj +1 more source
Davida Bohma teoria zmiennych ukrytych
One of the most important interpretative problems of quantum mechanics concerns the so called hidden variables. Sometimes it is said that the Bell's theorem falsifies theories of such variables, but in fact, it falsifies only local ones. This paper deals
Tadeusz Pabjan
doaj

