Results 11 to 20 of about 114,918,185 (283)
Judging Beyond Any Reasonable Doubt [PDF]
Quaestio FactiThe doubt is not related to innocence but only to guilt, the latter being the exclusive object of the process. The proof of guilt, being always of inductive nature, cannot accept the deductive method that connotes the relationship between premise (minor
Rocco Neri
doaj +5 more sources
Death Beyond a Reasonable Doubt [PDF]
Arkansas Law Review, 2017 In the forty-four years since the Court employed the Eighth Amendment to temporarily suspend the death penalty in the United States in Furman v. Georgia in 1972, the Court has spilled an enormous amount of ink attempting to instruct the states on how to properly guide jurors’ discretion in imposing the death penalty.
Hoeffel, Janet C.
openaire +2 more sources
Reasonable Doubt in Islamic Law [PDF]
, 2015 Doubt pervades most laws, becomes alarming when it arises in criminal law, and seems especially discomfiting in the context of Islamic criminal law. In the high-stakes area of American criminal prosecutions, dubious facts or ambiguous laws can result in ...
Rabb, Intisar A., Rabb, Intisar
core +6 more sources
Calcium on trial: Beyond a reasonable doubt? [PDF]
Kidney International, 2003 To the Editor: The interesting paper by Chertow et al1 brings up five interesting points. First, their study does not discuss previous studies with electron beam tomography (EBT) in dialysis patients2,3, which demonstrate different progression rates associated with lipid status3, like that in the general population Figure 1, and show a lack of any ...
Canavese, Caterina +4 more
+10 more sources
Do Juries Understand the Criminal Standard of Proof of Beyond Reasonable Doubt? [PDF]
, 2021 In Green v The Queen and La Fontaine v The Queen, the High Court stated that it is both unnecessary and unwise for a trial judge to seek to explain to the jury the meaning of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’, on the ground that the phrase is well understood ...
Hemming, Andrew
core +1 more source
Beyond reasonable doubt: A proposal for undecidedness blocking in abstract argumentation [PDF]
Intelligenza Artificiale, 2020 In Dung’s abstract semantics, the label undecided is always propagated from the attacker to the attacked argument, unless the latter is also attacked by an accepted argument. In this work we propose undecidedness blocking abstract argumentation semantics where the undecided label is confined to the strong connected component where it was generated and
Pierpaolo Dondio, Luca Longo
openaire +5 more sources
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Juries Don’t Get It
, 2021 Proof beyond a reasonable doubt has been de rigueur in criminal cases almost since the dawn of the republic. It is based on the premise that it is better to let several guilty people go free in order to save one innocent person from wrongful conviction.
Muth, Karl T., Shapiro, Hon. James A.
core +1 more source
Why the Jury in Pell v The Queen Must Have Had a Doubt and the High Court was Right to Quash the Guilty Verdicts [PDF]
Australian Journal of Law & Religion, 2022 In the aftermath of the High Court’s decision in Pell v The Queen to quash the guilty verdicts and enter verdicts of acquittal in their place, there has been considerable public discussion and academic commentary on the respective roles of the jury and ...
Andrew Hemming
doaj +1 more source
Legal imperatives of medical negligence and medical malpractice
Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 2022 Medical negligence and malpractice are becoming a growing concern in Nigeria; even though many victims do not know how to go about seeking redress or demand justice, medical practitioners, too, do not understand the legal implications of their actions ...
Hassan King Obaro
doaj +1 more source
Entrepreneurship, Tuvalu, development and .tv: a response [PDF]
Island Studies Journal, 2015 This paper comments on ‘Entrepreneurship and the Dot TV Phenomenon’ by Baldacchino & Mellor (2015) who suggest that state-run entrepreneurship is behind the success of .tv.
James M. Conway
doaj +2 more sources