Results 231 to 240 of about 114,918,185 (283)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Choice Reviews Online, 1999
More than forty years have passed since the author first put forward the argument that traditionally observant Jews have no reason to take issue with the results obtained by the historical critics in their investigation into the Bible and the other classical sources of Judaism.
openaire +2 more sources
More than forty years have passed since the author first put forward the argument that traditionally observant Jews have no reason to take issue with the results obtained by the historical critics in their investigation into the Bible and the other classical sources of Judaism.
openaire +2 more sources
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1987
(1987). Guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Australasian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 182-187.
Robert Pargetter
exaly +2 more sources
(1987). Guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Australasian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 182-187.
Robert Pargetter
exaly +2 more sources
2023
This book investigates the legal nature and criminal responsibility of ISIL/DAESH’s crimes against civilians in Iraq, especially Christians. The author examines whether these crimes constitute genocide or persecution as crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute, based on the actus reus and mens rea of the perpetrators.
openaire +1 more source
This book investigates the legal nature and criminal responsibility of ISIL/DAESH’s crimes against civilians in Iraq, especially Christians. The author examines whether these crimes constitute genocide or persecution as crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute, based on the actus reus and mens rea of the perpetrators.
openaire +1 more source
Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
Nature Genetics, 2007Genome-wide association studies, exemplified by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium and follow-up studies, have identified dozens of common variants robustly associated with common diseases, providing new clues about genetic architecture in humans.
David Altshuler, Mark Daly
openaire +1 more source
Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubts
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011Proof beyond reasonable doubt has not been defined. Prof. Wigmore in his classic Treatise on Evidence highlights the difficulties in ascertaining how convinced one must be to become convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. He says that “the truth is that no one has invented or discovered a mode of measurement for the intensity of human belief. Hence, there
Praveen Kumar +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Re-reconsidering Burt: Beyond a reasonable doubt
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1997The Burt controversy has taken a number of strange twists and turns, leading many observers to conclude that he has been exonerated of the accusation that he fabricated his data on monozygotic twins reared apart. A comparison of his twin sample with that from other well documented studies, however, leaves little doubt that he committed fraud.
openaire +2 more sources
Beyond a reasonable doubt?:Bisphosphonates and atypical femur fractures - a clinical debate
Bone, 2012In May 2011, we were privileged to debate on behalf of the ECTS and the ASBMR in a Clinical Debate hosted by the IBMS and the ECTS with the motion "Atypical femoral shaft fractures are a consequence of bisphosphonate therapy". The evidence presented for and against the motion is summarized and discussed in this joint commentary.
Abrahamsen, Bo, Einhorn, Thomas A
openaire +1 more source
Beyond Reasonable Doubt – a paradox of ideological immunity
South African Journal of Philosophy, 2012Ideology criticism, like scepticism, calls into question the objective orjustified status of beliefs. However, where scepticism only refutes,and never puts forward, a substantive claim about anything, the ideologycritic must maintain some criterion for distinguishing ideas which support relations of domination from those that do not, in virtue of her ...
openaire +2 more sources
Afterword: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?
2014In the afterward the author reconsiders his initial thesis and the arguments brought forward to support it. He has not been able to give a definitive response that goes beyond all reasonable doubt. The many years that have passed since the novel was written, along with the consolidated tradition of literary studies, have not facilitated his research ...
openaire +1 more source