Results 31 to 40 of about 62,738 (284)
Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used to evaluate individual scientists-as is exemplified by the popularity of the many other publication and citation-based indicators used in evaluation.
Peter van den Besselaar, Ulf Sandström
doaj +1 more source
What Is Wrong With the Current Evaluative Bibliometrics?
Bibliometric data are relatively simple and describe objective processes of publishing articles and citing others. It seems quite straightforward to define reasonable measures of a researcher's productivity, research quality, or overall performance based
Endel Põder
doaj +1 more source
Bibliometric evaluation of research performance: where do we stand?
This work provides a critical examination of the most popular bibliometric indicators and methodologies to assess the research performance of individuals and institutions.
Abramo, Giovanni
core +1 more source
The relation between Eigenfactor, audience factor, and influence weight [PDF]
We present a theoretical and empirical analysis of a number of bibliometric indicators of journal performance. We focus on three indicators in particular, namely the Eigenfactor indicator, the audience factor, and the influence weight indicator. Our main
Adler +30 more
core +3 more sources
Altmetric and bibliometric indicators for academic social networks: Academia.edu & ResearchGate
Background: E-visibility embodies the online presence of a researcher and their research, the researcher’s discoverability, and the accessibility of the research.
Leslie Adriaanse +2 more
doaj +1 more source
The comparison of two universities in terms of bibliometric indicators frequently faces the problem of assessing the differences as meaningful or not. This Letter to the Editor proposes some benchmarks which can be used for supporting the interpretation ...
Bornmann, Lutz, Glänzel, Wolfgang
core +1 more source
Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large-scale analysis [PDF]
Most Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) draw on peer review and bibliometric indicators, two different method- ologies which are sometimes combined.
A Baccini +11 more
core +2 more sources
Harnessing Phase Separation for the Development of High‐Performance Hydrogels
ABSTRACT Hydrogels are indispensable for the development of next‐generation bioelectronics, soft robotics, and biomedical devices, where their mechanical properties determine performance and reliability. Among strategies to enhance hydrogel mechanics, phase separation enables controlled heterogeneity resulting in gel networks that are reinforced by ...
Yue Shao +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Bibliometric analysis reveals rising global research on physical activity and elderly health, dominated by developed nations. Key hotspots include healthy aging, physical activity's mental health benefits, and VR exercise interventions. Promoting physical activity is vital for healthy aging, requiring greater technology integration and research from ...
Hongman Wang +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Evaluating a Department’s Research: Testing the Leiden Methodology in Business and Management [PDF]
The Leiden methodology (LM), also sometimes called the “crown indicator”, is a quantitative method for evaluating the research quality of a research group or academic department based on the citations received by the group in comparison to averages for ...
Abramo +37 more
core +1 more source

