Results 291 to 300 of about 2,761,729 (349)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
European Psychologist, 1998
This article discusses the rationale, content, structure, status, and cross-cultural assessment of the Big Five trait factors, focusing on topics of dispute and misunderstanding. Taxonomic restrictions of the original Big Five forerunner, the “Norman Five,” are discussed, and criticisms regarding the lexical hypothesis are refuted.
openaire +3 more sources
This article discusses the rationale, content, structure, status, and cross-cultural assessment of the Big Five trait factors, focusing on topics of dispute and misunderstanding. Taxonomic restrictions of the original Big Five forerunner, the “Norman Five,” are discussed, and criticisms regarding the lexical hypothesis are refuted.
openaire +3 more sources
The “big five” and hypnotic suggestibility
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2002A recent approach to personality measurement argues that the essential personality traits are encompassed by 5 basic factors: openness/intellect, conscientiousness, neuroticism, agreeableness, and extraversion. This study used the Big Five Inventory to test the hypothesis that 1 or more of the 5 factors underlie hypnotic suggestibility.
Benita K, Nordenstrom +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
The big five as tendencies in situations
Personality and Individual Differences, 1994Abstract These studies scrutinize, in a Dutch and Italian sample, various types of consistency of the Big Five personality dimensions. Taking a general taxonomy of situations and the five-factor scheme as points of departure, an S-R Big Five Questionnaire, called TinSit, was constructed.
Van Heck G. +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Personality, 1998
Previous investigators have proposed that various kinds of person‐descriptive content—such as differences in attitudes or values, in sheer evaluation, in attractiveness, or in height and girth—are not adequately captured by the Big Five Model. We report on a rather exhaustive search for reliable sources of Big Five–independent variation in data from ...
G, Saucier, L R, Goldberg
openaire +2 more sources
Previous investigators have proposed that various kinds of person‐descriptive content—such as differences in attitudes or values, in sheer evaluation, in attractiveness, or in height and girth—are not adequately captured by the Big Five Model. We report on a rather exhaustive search for reliable sources of Big Five–independent variation in data from ...
G, Saucier, L R, Goldberg
openaire +2 more sources
The big five of the monocot genomes
Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2016Monocots represent a monophyletic clade of the angiosperms that - based on fossil and molecular records - originated at around the Early Cretaceous from aquatic and wetland ancestors. Among their members are important crops including maize, wheat, rice, sorghum and barley, accounting for the major source for the daily calorie uptake by humans ...
Haberer, G., Mayer, K.F.X., Spannagl, M.
openaire +3 more sources
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Small Group Research, 2005The study of teamwork has been fragmented through the years, and the findings are generally unable to be used practically. This article argues that it is possible to boil down what researchers know about teamwork into five core components that the authors submit as the “Big Five” in teamwork.
Salas, Eduardo +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
The Big Three or the Big Five? A replication study
Personality and Individual Differences, 2000Abstract This study addresses the question of the dimensionality of personality, in particular comparing the three- and five-factor models and trying to replicate the findings of Draycott and Kline (Draycott, S. G., & Kline, P. (1995). The Big Three or the Big Five — the EPQ-R vs the NEO-PI: a research note, replication and elaboration.
openaire +2 more sources
Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 2006
Abstract. A new measure of the Big Five personality constructs, the Openness Conscientiousness Extraversion Agreeableness Neuroticism Index Condensed (OCEANIC), was developed and validated. In Study 1 (N = 166), the convergent validity with the Big Five as assessed by the NEO-FFI was established. Study 2 (N = 3 808) served to investigate the structure
Ralf Schulze, Richard D. Roberts
openaire +1 more source
Abstract. A new measure of the Big Five personality constructs, the Openness Conscientiousness Extraversion Agreeableness Neuroticism Index Condensed (OCEANIC), was developed and validated. In Study 1 (N = 166), the convergent validity with the Big Five as assessed by the NEO-FFI was established. Study 2 (N = 3 808) served to investigate the structure
Ralf Schulze, Richard D. Roberts
openaire +1 more source
2008
Mike Brown could not believe his ears. Was the renowned Schmidt Telescope at the Mount Palomar Observatory really going to be mothballed? Surely it was working just fine?
openaire +1 more source
Mike Brown could not believe his ears. Was the renowned Schmidt Telescope at the Mount Palomar Observatory really going to be mothballed? Surely it was working just fine?
openaire +1 more source