Results 31 to 40 of about 1,688 (181)

The Racialisation of Rape: A Far‐Right Tool for Boundary‐Creation Across Borders

Nations and Nationalism, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Far‐right parties and movements have increasingly come to incorporate ideas of gender equality into their political agendas. While seemingly out of concern for women's rights and safety, these issues are in reality seldom more than a veil to further the stigmatisation of Muslim men.
Mathilda Åkerlund
wiley   +1 more source

Moving from Fear and Hatred to Acceptance and Mutual Respect

Journal of the Council for Research on Religion
This paper offers an overview of Hinduphobia, exploring its historical roots and contemporary forms in North America. Despite debates on its validity, this paper argues that Hinduphobia is a real and distinct form of prejudice combining racism and ...
Jeffery D. Long
doaj   +1 more source

Nativism, Sons of the Soil and Autochthony: On Internal Migration and the Politics of Belonging

Nations and Nationalism, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT There is a longstanding and global history of fierce opposition to internal migration across regions. Yet despite the salience of this issue, there is a relative dearth of scholarship on the politics around domestic population movements. This paper critically engages three interrelated concepts in conversation: nativism, sons of the soil and ...
Isabelle Côté, Matthew I. Mitchell, Catherine Xhardez   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

The Trump Wall: A Cultural Wall and a Cultural War

Lateral, 2017
In a phonetic reverberation between 'wall' and 'war,' this essay is centered on the interplay between a cultural wall and a cultural war. When President Trump vows to build a "great, great" wall, physical and impenetrable on the US-Mexico border, an ...
Mimi Yang
doaj   +1 more source

Toward an Understanding of the Characteristics of Secondary School Cyberhate Perpetrators

Frontiers in Education, 2019
While the Internet offers many opportunities to access information, training and communication, it has created new grounds for risks, threats and harm.
Catherine Blaya, Catherine Blaya, Catherine Audrin, Catherine Audrin   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Strategies for Public Administration Research: Insights From the Scholarship of Christopher Hood

Public Administration, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT In an era of time constraints and publication pressures, scholars risk becoming entrenched in familiar approaches. Christopher Hood's public administration scholarship reminds us that excellence often arises from a broad exploration of ideas. This paper identifies three core elements of Hood's research practice. First, a deep skepticism toward
Ruth Dixon, Rozana Himaz, Maia King, Barbara Maria Piotrowska   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Ableism in the service of transphobia: J. K. Rowling as a case study

Transformative Works and Cultures
I discuss the use of ableism to enable and promote transphobia. I focus on J. K. Rowling as a case study and demonstrate her rhetorical use of disabled people's accessibility needs to justify antitrans bigotry.
Dean Leetal
doaj   +1 more source

The “Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations” And Its Role in Maintaining White Supremacy through Mathematics Education

Occasional Paper Series, 2019
In this study, we offer an analysis of the phrase the "soft bigotry of low expectations" and considers its role in rhetoric about U.S. mathematics education policy and practice, especially in regards to Critical Mathematical Inquiry.
Laurie Rubel, Andrea V McCloskey
doaj   +1 more source

Gnosticism and Inexact Knowledge

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, EarlyView.
Abstract Gnostic consequentialism holds that a belief is rational just in case it is sufficiently likely to constitute knowledge. I show that this view makes implausible dynamic predictions when combined with the most influential models of the “inexact knowledge” we have in cases involving imprecise measurement or repeated chance processes.
Bernhard Salow
wiley   +1 more source

Standing Your Ground on Moral Disagreement

Ratio, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Moral disagreement is often invoked to support skeptical conclusions about moral judgment, typically by modeling it on the epistemology of peer disagreement. On the dominant picture, disagreement with a peer supplies higher‐order evidence of error and thereby rationally requires suspension of judgment or a substantial reduction in confidence ...
Mario Gensollen, Marc Jiménez‐Rolland, Alejandro Mosqueda   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source