Left bundle branch area pacing vs biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. [PDF]
Yousaf A +8 more
europepmc +1 more source
Controversy: in heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, conduction system pacing can be a valid alternative to biventricular pacing-pro and contra. [PDF]
Burri H +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
Beyond Biventricular Pacing: Revisiting CRT Strategies in the Asian Heart Failure Population. [PDF]
Kim M.
europepmc +1 more source
Conventional biventricular pacing is still preferred to conduction system pacing for atrioventricular block in patients with reduced ejection fraction and narrow QRS. [PDF]
Glikson M +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Simultaneous biventricular pacing
Tsuyoshi Kawamura +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Left bundle branch pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy <i>vs</i> biventricular pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy-time to write a requiem for biventricular pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy. [PDF]
Pradhan A, Saggu D, Bhandari M.
europepmc +1 more source
Clinical phenotypes and outcomes associated with improved left ventricular ejection fraction after biventricular pacing. [PDF]
Kunte SA +11 more
europepmc +1 more source
Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices with heart failure diagnostics detects signs of heart failure exacerbation related to a decrease in biventricular pacing. [PDF]
Miller A +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Left bundle branch area pacing vs. biventricular pacing significantly improves clinical outcomes and cardiac remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [PDF]
Zheng Z +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
His-Purkinje system pacing versus biventricular pacing in clinical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [PDF]
Wang Y +6 more
europepmc +1 more source

