Results 131 to 140 of about 489 (177)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2020
Robert Brandom’s book on Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit is a very impressive achievement, full of interesting ideas which will start new and fruitful chains of enquiry. Hegel tackles the dead-end nature of the Cartesian approach in the introduction to the Phenomenology, where he shows up the inadequacy of theories of knowledge ...
openaire +1 more source
Robert Brandom’s book on Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit is a very impressive achievement, full of interesting ideas which will start new and fruitful chains of enquiry. Hegel tackles the dead-end nature of the Cartesian approach in the introduction to the Phenomenology, where he shows up the inadequacy of theories of knowledge ...
openaire +1 more source
The Philosophical Quarterly, 2003
Robert Brandom claims that language expressing pro-attitudes makes explicit proprieties of practical inference. This thesis is untenable, especially given certain premises which Brandom himself endorses. Pro-attitude vocabulary has the wrong grammatical structure; other parts of vocabulary do the job he ascribes to pro-attitude vocabulary; the thesis ...
openaire +1 more source
Robert Brandom claims that language expressing pro-attitudes makes explicit proprieties of practical inference. This thesis is untenable, especially given certain premises which Brandom himself endorses. Pro-attitude vocabulary has the wrong grammatical structure; other parts of vocabulary do the job he ascribes to pro-attitude vocabulary; the thesis ...
openaire +1 more source
Robert Brandom’s Normative Inferentialism
2017The philosophy of language of Robert Brandom is based on a theoretical structure composed of three main elements: the normative analysis of linguistic practices, the inferential characterization of conceptual contents and the expressive articulation of the relations between the former two.
openaire +2 more sources
Brandom’s Demarcation of Logic
Philosophical Topics, 2008In my dissertation (which I wrote under Brandom's supervision), I argued that in order to understand the confused state of contemporary debates about the demarcation of logic, one has to go back to Kant.2 Following tradition, Kant thought of logic as a normative discipline, with the job of identifying norms for thought.
openaire +1 more source
Brandom on Representation and Inference
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1997It will take repeated engagements to come to terms with Brandom's huge, cohesive, quirky, and brilliant book. Here I can make only a first pass at one of its architectonic themes. The book is organized around an opposition between two explanatory strategies-representationalism, which Brandom says "has been dominant since the Enlightenment" (p.
openaire +1 more source
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
ABSTRACTThis paper undertakes the test of deflating the notion of entitlement in Robert Brandom's main approach to explain human discursive agency: the deontic scorekeeping model. The core claim is that entitlement can be either irrelevant, subsidiary, or less relevant than the other major notion of Brandom's model: commitment.
openaire +1 more source
ABSTRACTThis paper undertakes the test of deflating the notion of entitlement in Robert Brandom's main approach to explain human discursive agency: the deontic scorekeeping model. The core claim is that entitlement can be either irrelevant, subsidiary, or less relevant than the other major notion of Brandom's model: commitment.
openaire +1 more source
2018
Sixty-five years after John Dewey’s last publication, there is an enormous literature interpreting, criticizing, and developing his pragmatism. Some working this vein are called “pragmatists,” while others are variously named “neopragmatists,” “new pragmatists,” and “linguistic pragmatists.” In general, the latter groups (a) focus more upon language ...
openaire +1 more source
Sixty-five years after John Dewey’s last publication, there is an enormous literature interpreting, criticizing, and developing his pragmatism. Some working this vein are called “pragmatists,” while others are variously named “neopragmatists,” “new pragmatists,” and “linguistic pragmatists.” In general, the latter groups (a) focus more upon language ...
openaire +1 more source