Types and unitary representations of reductive p-adic groups. [PDF]
Ciubotaru D.
europepmc +1 more source
Identifying bellwether sewershed sites for sustainable disease surveillance in Bengaluru, India: a longitudinal study. [PDF]
Daniel RF +8 more
europepmc +1 more source
Stability of Spline-Type Systems in the Abelian Case. [PDF]
Onchis D, Zappalà S.
europepmc +1 more source
Classical Bruhat orders and lexicographic shellability
openaire +2 more sources
Occupational exposure to organic solvents and the risk of developing testicular germ cell tumors (TESTIS study): Effect of combined exposure assessment on risk estimation. [PDF]
Guth M +18 more
europepmc +1 more source
Multicomponent Behavioural Intervention during Pregnancy to Reduce Home Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial in Bangladesh and India. [PDF]
Satyanarayana VA +8 more
europepmc +1 more source
Related searches:
The Bruhat order on symmetric varieties
Geometriae Dedicata, 1990Let G be a connected reductive linear algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not 2. Let θ be an automorphism of order 2 of the algebraic group G. Denote by K the fixed point group of θ and by B a Borel group of G. It is known that the number of double cosets BgK is finite.
R.W. Richardson, T.A. Springer
openaire +1 more source
Bruhat Order and Transfer for Complex Reductive Groups
Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 1992AbstractLet G be a complex reductive group, and G^ its set of irreducible admissible representations. The Bruhat order on G^ is defined in a natural way. We prove that this Bruhat order is preserved by transfer. This gives new proofs of some results by the author on L-functions.
openaire +1 more source
Order Dimension, Strong Bruhat Order and Lattice Properties for Posets
Order, 2002zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
Automorphisms of the Bruhat order on Coxeter Groups
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 1989The author provides a very clean argument which establishes (Theorem 1) that if \(\phi\) is an automorphism of the Bruhat order of a Coxeter group then \(\phi\) has a ``standard'' decomposition \(\phi =\phi_ 3\cdot \phi_ 2\cdot \phi_ 1\) where \(\phi_ 1\) is a diagram automorphism; \(\phi_ 2\) maps components to themselves either as an identity map or ...
openaire +2 more sources

