Results 251 to 260 of about 217,445 (309)
The Brussels and California Effects? Circular Economy Policy Influence Across Borders. [PDF]
Circ Econ SustainBocken N, Coffay M, Dalhammar C.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Jurisdiction under the Brussels I Regulation Recast
2022Abstract This chapter evaluates jurisdiction under the Brussels I Regulation recast. The general rules is that a defendant must be sued in the court of its domicile. However, additional heads of jurisdiction, based on a link between the facts of the case and another jurisdiction, can also be relied on by claimants in certain ...
exaly +2 more sources
The Brussels I Regulation Recast
2015Abstract The Brussels I Regulation has undergone a lengthy review process, resulting in Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 of 12 December 2012 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Recast). The provisions of the new Regulation apply from 10 January 2015.
exaly +2 more sources
2023
The Brussels I-bis Regulation remains the most significant legal instrument for procedural law in the EU, providing the cornerstone for questions of international jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. This authoritative book provides a thorough and practical analysis of the Regulation, with particular focus on its ...
Lazić, V., Mankowski, P.
openaire +3 more sources
The Brussels I-bis Regulation remains the most significant legal instrument for procedural law in the EU, providing the cornerstone for questions of international jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. This authoritative book provides a thorough and practical analysis of the Regulation, with particular focus on its ...
Lazić, V., Mankowski, P.
openaire +3 more sources
Common Market Law Review, 2013
The most important amendments to the Brussels I Regulation adopted on 12 December 2012 are presented and discussed. The amendments concern: 1) arbitration, 2) external situations, 3) choice-of-court agreements, and 4) abolition of exequatur. Compared to the Commission's ambitions, only modest, but probably useful compromises were achieved in respect of
openaire +2 more sources
The most important amendments to the Brussels I Regulation adopted on 12 December 2012 are presented and discussed. The amendments concern: 1) arbitration, 2) external situations, 3) choice-of-court agreements, and 4) abolition of exequatur. Compared to the Commission's ambitions, only modest, but probably useful compromises were achieved in respect of
openaire +2 more sources
International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2001
On 22 December 2000, the Council of the European Union finally adopted Regulation 44/2001, which transforms the Brussels I Convention into a Community law instrument, pursuant to Arts. 61(c) and 67(1) of the EC Treaty. The basic framework of the Regulation remains similar to that of the Convention, although there are numerous changes on points of ...
openaire +1 more source
On 22 December 2000, the Council of the European Union finally adopted Regulation 44/2001, which transforms the Brussels I Convention into a Community law instrument, pursuant to Arts. 61(c) and 67(1) of the EC Treaty. The basic framework of the Regulation remains similar to that of the Convention, although there are numerous changes on points of ...
openaire +1 more source
The Recast Brussels I Regulation and Arbitration: Revisited or Revised?
Arbitration International, 2014The revision of the Brussels I Regulation has come to an end. During the revision process the exclusion of arbitration from the scope of the Regulation has been much debated. This debate was not only ignited by the revision of the Regulation, but also by the decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the West Tankers case.
openaire +2 more sources