Results 21 to 30 of about 5,418 (222)

Evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of different devices for canine retraction

open access: yesDental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 2012
OBJECTIVE: To mechanically evaluate different systems used for canine retraction. METHODS: Three different methods for partial canine retraction were evaluated: retraction with elastic chain directly attached to bracket; elastic chain connected to ...
Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas   +2 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Miniscrew implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without Corticotomy Facilitated Orthodontics (CFO)

open access: yesJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 2021
Introduction: The purpose of the study was to scientifically test maxillary canine retraction assisted by miniscrew implant with corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.
Saurav Kumar   +5 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Evaluation of canine retraction following periodontal distraction using NiTi coil spring and implants – A clinical study

open access: yesJournal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 2014
Objective: To evaluate the amount of canine retraction with periodontal distraction using miniscrew implants and NiTi coil spring. Material and method: Sample comprised of 25 patients who were scheduled for all 1st premolar extraction (13 males and 12 ...
Rohit Khanna, Tripti Tikku
exaly   +3 more sources

Comparison of rate of canine retraction and anchorage potential between mini-implant and conventional molar anchorage: An In vivo study

open access: yesContemporary Clinical Dentistry, 2018
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the rate of canine retraction, the anchorage loss, and the change in the inclination of the first molars between molar and mini-implant anchorage.
D Davis   +6 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and expression of biomarkers: a randomized controlled clinical trial [PDF]

open access: yesDental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 2022
Introduction: Micro-osteoperforation is a minimally invasive technique that has been used to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement and reduce treatment duration. However, literature presents conflicting reports about this technique.
Pradeep RAGHAV   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Comparison of the Effects of Labial and Lingual Retraction of Canines Using Sliding Mechanics: an In-vivo Study [PDF]

open access: yesIranian Journal of Orthodontics, 2022
Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare labial and lingual forces of the rate of canine retraction and three dimensional control of the molar and canine using sliding mechanics.Methods: Ten patients with Angle’s class I malocclusion with ...
Sayyed Ali   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Different Methods of Canine Retraction- Part 1

open access: yesJournal of Baghdad College of Dentistry, 2022
Background: This review aimed at explaining different methods of canine retraction along the archwire. Methods: Searching for different methods of canine retraction using fixed orthodontic appliances was carried out using different databases, including ...
Mohammed Nahidh   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Canine root/cortical bone relation (CRCR) and the orthodontic tooth movement

open access: yesScientific Reports, 2022
This observational study evaluates three-dimensionally the relation between the root of maxillary canine and overlying labial cortical plate of bone during orthodontic canine retraction.
Amr R. El-Beialy   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Comparative evaluation of pentraxin 3 levels in GCF during canine retraction with active tieback and NiTi coil spring: An in vivo study

open access: yesJournal of Orthodontic Science, 2016
Objectives: To compare the levels of pentraxin 3 (PTX-3) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in patients undergoing orthodontic canine retraction with active tieback and nickel titanium (NiTi) coil spring.
Pratik Patel   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

PG Canine Retraction Spring [PDF]

open access: yesMedical Journal Armed Forces India, 2003
PG canine retraction spring was introduced to the orthodontic profession way back in 1985 by Poul Gjessing; it was not widely used till interest in it was renewed in recent years because of its adaptability to the now commonly used 0.018” pre-adjusted edgewise appliance system.
Jaideep, Sengupta   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy