Results 111 to 120 of about 16,768 (145)
Fuzzy incidence coloring under structural operations for communication channel allocation. [PDF]
Deji A, Wang Q, Zhou L.
europepmc +1 more source
Editorial: Resources for developmental ecological psychology: organicism, epigenetics, relational development, dynamic systems. [PDF]
Szokolszky A +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
A case for resonant X-ray Bragg diffraction by a collinear antiferromagnet Li<sub>2</sub>Ni<sub>3</sub>P<sub>4</sub>O<sub>14</sub>. [PDF]
Lovesey SW.
europepmc +1 more source
From Atoms to Dynamics: Learning the Committor Without Collective Variables
Chipot C +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Factoring cartesian‐product graphs
Journal of Graph Theory, 1994AbstractIn a fundamental paper, G. Sabidussi [“Graph Multiplication,” Mathematische Zeitschrift, Vol. 72 (1960), pp. 446–457] used a tower of equivalence relations on the edge set E(G) of a connected graph G to decompose G into a Cartesian product of prime graphs. Later, a method by R.L. Graham and P.M.
Imrich, Wilfried, Žerovnik, Janez
openaire +2 more sources
Radicals commuting with cartesian products
Archiv der Mathematik, 1998Given an Abelian group \(G\), the group radical is defined by \(R_G(X)=\bigcap\{\text{Ker }\phi\mid\phi\colon X\to G\}\), for Abelian groups \(X\). This radical does not always commute with infinite direct products (for instance, when \(G=\mathbb{Q}\), it turns into the torsion radical).
Corner, A. L. S., Göbel, Rüdiger
openaire +2 more sources
Using Cartesian Product for Animation
The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 2000AbstractIn the field of geometric modelling for animation, 4D modelling (time being the fourth dimension) seems to be a natural extension of 3D modelling. But time dimension is not easy to apprehend and 4D objects are difficult to interpret and to control in general.
Skapin, X., Lienhardt, P.
openaire +2 more sources
1970
When we say in analytic geometry that a point has co-ordinates (x, y), the order in which x and y occur, in the symbol (x, y), is important: (1, 2) ≠ (2, 1). For this reason we call (x, y) an ordered pair. Moreover, x and y come from sets; in this case x, y ∈ R. This idea can be generalizedf as follows. Let 𝒰 be a universe.
H. B. Griffiths, P. J. Hilton
openaire +1 more source
When we say in analytic geometry that a point has co-ordinates (x, y), the order in which x and y occur, in the symbol (x, y), is important: (1, 2) ≠ (2, 1). For this reason we call (x, y) an ordered pair. Moreover, x and y come from sets; in this case x, y ∈ R. This idea can be generalizedf as follows. Let 𝒰 be a universe.
H. B. Griffiths, P. J. Hilton
openaire +1 more source

