Results 51 to 60 of about 310 (185)

The EU interinstitutional body for ethical standards: A legal and policy analysis

European Law Journal, Volume 30, Issue 4, Page 545-558, December 2024.
Abstract Amid several high‐profile ethical scandals, the EU has been discussing since the early 2000s the establishment of a dedicated EU ethics authority capable of restoring trust in its institutions. This article provides one of the first assessments of the newly adopted EU Interinstitutional Body for Ethical Standards by examining whether and how ...
Alberto Alemanno
wiley   +1 more source

PERAN LEMBAGA PERADILAN DALAM PEMBATASAN UPAYA HUKUM DALAM PERKARA PERDATA

Mimbar Hukum, 2016
In order to application of judicial principle is simple, fast and low cost is to reduce accumulation of cases in the Supreme Court especially at the level of Cassation. Along with the increasing number of incoming cases, and was sentenced in the District
Bambang Sugeng Ariadi, Trisadini P. Usanti, Johan Wahyudi   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Borderline institution

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Volume 54, Issue 3, Page 336-353, September 2024.
Abstract This paper introduces the concept of “borderline institution” to characterize an institution in which actors push upstream the boundary between the normal and the pathological and find downstream ways of systematically taking advantage of this push ex‐post.
Emmanuel Lazega
wiley   +1 more source

The determined indeterminacy of white supremacy

American Ethnologist, Volume 51, Issue 3, Page 433-447, August 2024.
Abstract Contemporary white supremacy often takes hold through strategies of racial disavowal. One strategy that political parties and regular citizens in Bulgaria use is what I call determined indeterminacy. Determined indeterminacy is a collective, institutionalized method of denying the ubiquitous systemic racism that undergirds social life.
Elana Resnick
wiley   +1 more source

REFORM OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW AT THE APPELLATE-LEVEL COURTS IN INDONESIA

Mimbar Hukum, 2016
The frst court and the appellate-level court serve as the judex facti, but there are different regulations about procedural law in HIR, RBG, and Law No. 20 of 1947. It causes high fling of cassation appeals.
Mohammad Amir Hamzah
doaj   +1 more source

C v D: A Missed Opportunity to Clarify the Distinction Between Jurisdiction and Admissibility

The Modern Law Review, Volume 87, Issue 3, Page 715-727, May 2024.
The distinction between issues of jurisdiction and admissibility is at the heart of arbitration law due to the role it plays in defining the relationship between tribunals and the courts of the seat. Nevertheless, there has long been controversy as to the foundation of the distinction and on which side of the line the issue of alleged non‐compliance ...
Shaun Matos
wiley   +1 more source

Appeal against court judgement (decision) in Polish civil procedure: Selected problems

Ученые записки Казанского университета: Серия Гуманитарные науки, 2019
The selected problems and issues of appeal against judgements and decisions of the court in accordance with the Polish Code of Civil Procedure have been considered.
Ja. Turłukowski
doaj   +1 more source

From smuggled migrants to ‘alleged smugglers’: Empirical evidence and policy perspectives on the criminalization of people on the move in Italy

International Migration, Volume 62, Issue 2, Page 215-231, April 2024.
Abstract Since 2014, numerous people on the move have been accused of migrant smuggling in Italian courts for steering makeshift vessels or for assisting in navigation across the Mediterranean Sea. This is the case regardless of the fact that such behaviour was the result of coercion or threats.
Federico Alagna
wiley   +1 more source

Polish Administrative Court’s Dissenting Opinions in Excise Duty Cases

Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 2020
This article presents the results of the examination dissenting opinions submitted by judges of administrative courts in excise duty cases in the years 2004–2018.
Patryk Kowalski
doaj   +1 more source

Civil liability for climate change? The proposed tort in Smith v Fonterra with reference to France and the Netherlands

Review of European, Comparative &International Environmental Law, Volume 33, Issue 1, Page 31-44, April 2024.
Abstract As we enter into a period of unprecedented climate instability, litigation is becoming an attractive way to hold private entities accountable for their contribution to global warming. In Smith v Fonterra, New Zealand's Supreme Court is considering whether a common law duty to limit emissions should form part of New Zealand's environmental ...
Sarah Downs
wiley   +1 more source