Results 1 to 10 of about 2,223 (143)
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021 The Supreme Court has wide discretion to choose the cases it will decide. These choices matter, as they both shape and are shaped by our national social, political, and economic discourse. So how does the Court exercise its discretion? The Supreme Court’s rules explain that it may hear any case “important” enough for it to decide.
Tejas N. Narechania
openaire +3 more sources
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 2020 This paper exploring the writ of certiorari in the United States Constitutional Law is the second of the series “Constitutional Law Around the Globe”.
Luiz Henrique Diniz Araújo
doaj +2 more sources
International perspectives on AI-driven pharmaceutical IP challenges [PDF]
Frontiers in Digital HealthArtificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the pharmaceutical sector by optimizing care delivery and accelerating drug design. While AI introduces significant benefits, it presents complex challenges regarding intellectual property (IP) frameworks ...
Grace Y. Wang +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Certiorari in the Roberts Court
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022 Certiorari—the process by which the Supreme Court sets its docket—is a mystery. The Supreme Court’s rules explain that it may hear any sufficiently “important” case—a standard that seems hopelessly vague. In previous work, I tried to bring some coherence
Tejas N. Narechania
openaire +3 more sources
Temporal patterns in biosecurity-related regulation before and after Loper Bright [PDF]
Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyOverviewThe 2024 Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo ended Chevron deference, reshaping the relationship between federal agencies and the judiciary. This study examines the impact of this legal shift on U.S.
Daniel Irowa-Omoregie +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Certiorari, Universality, and a Patent Puzzle
Michigan Law Review, 2018 The most important determinant of a case’s chances for Supreme Court review is a circuit split: If two courts of appeals have decided the same issue differently, review is substantially more likely. But practically every appeal in a patent case makes its way to a single court—the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Tejas N. Narechania
openaire +4 more sources
SSRN Electronic Journal<p><span>The Supreme Court’s current certiorari jurisdiction is a powerful tool for judicial agenda control. The conventional wisdom holds that no law controls this discretion and that justices can consider strategic concerns and policy preferences in deciding which cases to hear. The result is a Court with the power to shape its docket and
Tyler B. Lindley
openaire +2 more sources
Certiorari Against Abolished Bodies
SSRN Electronic JournalIn AXG18 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2025] FedCFamC2G 865, the parties agreed that the Immigration Assessment Authority, before its recent abolition, had made a jurisdictional error. Judge Doust accepted this but refused to issue certiorari against the Authority. Certiorari in her Honour's Court, as in the High Court
Oliver Jones
openaire +2 more sources
Reforming Certiorari and Messing with Nullity
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022 Mark I. Aronson
openaire +2 more sources
Alcance de la Corte Constitucional en el sistema de selección y revisión
USFQ Law Review, 2021 La Constitución de 2008 convirtió a la Corte Constitucional en un órgano para la creación de precedentes constitucionales. En esa medida, una de sus facultades más importantes es la selección y revisión de sentencias de garantías jurisdiccionales.
Cristina Pazmiño Carrera
doaj +1 more source