Results 1 to 10 of about 78,819 (141)

Certiorari, Universality, and a Patent Puzzle

open access: bronzeMichigan Law Review, 2018
The most important determinant of a case’s chances for Supreme Court review is a circuit split: If two courts of appeals have decided the same issue differently, review is substantially more likely. But practically every appeal in a patent case makes its way to a single court—the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Tejas N. Narechania
openalex   +4 more sources

CERTIORARI AND THE SCOTTISH COURTS [PDF]

open access: bronzeThe Modern Law Review, 1962
Jacquelin Miller
openalex   +2 more sources

Certiorari in the Roberts Court

open access: greenSSRN Electronic Journal, 2022
Tejas N. Narechania
openalex   +3 more sources

Writ of Certiorari and Right to Legal Remedy

open access: greenSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
A writ of Certiorari can be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction committed by inferior courts or tribunals; where orders are passed by inferior courts or tribunals without Jurisdiction, or is in excess of it, or as a result of failure to exercise jurisdiction.
Shivnath Tripathi
openalex   +2 more sources

Certiorari in Important Cases

open access: yesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2021
The Supreme Court has wide discretion to choose the cases it will decide. These choices matter, as they both shape and are shaped by our national social, political, and economic discourse. So how does the Court exercise its discretion? The Supreme Court’s rules explain that it may hear any case “important” enough for it to decide.
openaire   +2 more sources

Judicial Choice Among Cases for Certiorari [PDF]

open access: yesSSRN Electronic Journal, 2016
How does the Supreme Court choose among cases to grant cert? In a model with a strategic Supreme Court, a continuum of rule-following lower courts, a set of potential cases for revision, and a dist...
Bustos Donoso, Álvaro, Jacobi, Tonja
openaire   +3 more sources

Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts’ of Appeals Image [PDF]

open access: yes, 2009
We argue that Congress should remake the United States Supreme Court in the U.S. courts\u27 of appeals image by increasing the size of the Court\u27s membership, authorizing panel decisionmaking, and retaining an en banc procedure for select cases. In so
George, Tracey E., Guthrie, Chris
core   +4 more sources

Back to the Future: Permitting Habeas Petitions Based on Intervening Retroactive Case Law to Alter Convictions and Sentences [PDF]

open access: yes, 2019
In 1948, Congress enacted 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which authorizes a motion for federal prisoners to “vacate, set aside or correct” their sentences, with the goal of improving judicial efficiency in collateral review.
Casale, Lauren
core   +1 more source

Walking the Line: Why the Presumption Against Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Patent Law Should Limit the Reach of 35 U.S.C. § 271(f) [PDF]

open access: yes, 2007
The advent of the digital era and the global market pose unique challenges to intellectual property law. To adapt, U.S. patent laws require constant interpretation in the face of rapidly changing technological advances. In AT&T Corp. v.
Giordano-Coltart, Jennifer
core   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy