Results 11 to 20 of about 81,501 (237)
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, 2020 This paper exploring the writ of certiorari in the United States Constitutional Law is the second of the series “Constitutional Law Around the Globe”.
Luiz Henrique Diniz Araújo
doaj +4 more sources
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021 The Supreme Court has wide discretion to choose the cases it will decide. These choices matter, as they both shape and are shaped by our national social, political, and economic discourse. So how does the Court exercise its discretion? The Supreme Court’s rules explain that it may hear any case “important” enough for it to decide.
Tejas N. Narechania
semanticscholar +4 more sources
Certiorari, Universality, and a Patent Puzzle
Michigan Law Review, 2018 The most important determinant of a case’s chances for Supreme Court review is a circuit split: If two courts of appeals have decided the same issue differently, review is substantially more likely. But practically every appeal in a patent case makes its way to a single court—the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Tejas N. Narechania
semanticscholar +5 more sources
Judicial Choice Among Cases for Certiorari [PDF]
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016 How does the Supreme Court choose among cases to grant cert? In a model with a strategic Supreme Court, a continuum of rule-following lower courts, a set of potential cases for revision, and a dist...
Bustos Donoso, Álvaro, Jacobi, Tonja
openaire +4 more sources
Certiorari in the Roberts Court
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022 Certiorari—the process by which the Supreme Court sets its docket—is a mystery. The Supreme Court’s rules explain that it may hear any sufficiently “important” case—a standard that seems hopelessly vague. In previous work, I tried to bring some coherence
Tejas N. Narechania
openaire +3 more sources
The Downstream Effects of Certiorari: Agenda-Setting, Amicus Briefs, and Opinion Writing on the US Supreme Court [PDF]
Journal of Law and CourtsThe majority opinion of the Supreme Court establishes precedent, but separate opinion writing affords the justices the ability to expound upon it or express their disagreement with the ruling or its logic. We broaden the exploration of separate opinion
Sahar Abi-Hassan +2 more
openalex +2 more sources
Analele Universitării din București Drept - Forum JuridicArt. III of the US Constitution establishes a Supreme Court, as well as other inferior federal courts ordained by Congress. Federal courts hear cases and controversies which involve federal law.
Gheorghe-Liviu ZIDARU +1 more
openalex +2 more sources
The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 2018 In its Burmych and Others v. Ukraine judgment of October 2017 the European Court of Human Rights dismissed more than 12,000 applications due to the fact that they were not only repetitive in nature, but also mutatis mutandis identical to applications ...
Geir Ulfstein, Andreas Zimmermann
openalex +2 more sources
Social Science Research Network, 2021 The U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the provision in Lanham Act that provides remedies to "any person who believes that he is or will be damaged," The Court set forth a two-prong test tied to the Act that should be used to assess whether a statutory ...
Charles Thomason
openalex +2 more sources
Kansas V. Johnson: On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas
, 2020 This amicus brief in support of Kansas’ petition for certiorari in Kansas v. Boettger discusses the important issue of whether the First Amendment require proof of specific intent to criminally punish violent threats.
Paul G. Cassell +6 more
openalex +2 more sources