Results 71 to 78 of about 127 (78)

Temporal variability in effective size (N _e) identifies sampling bias in close kin mark recapture estimate of population abundance (Nc(CKMR))

Although efforts to estimate Ne, Nc, and their ratio in wild populations are expanding, few empirical studies investigate interannual changes in these parameters. Hence, we do not know how representative many estimates may be. Answering this question requires studies of long-term population dynamics.
Daniel Ruzzante, Gregory McCracken, Dylan J. Fraser, John MacMillan, Colin Buhariwalla, Joanna Mills Flemming   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

CKMRpop: Forward‐in‐time simulation and tabulation of pairwise kin relationships in age‐structured populations

Molecular Ecology Resources, 2022
Eric C Anderson
exaly  

Close-kin mark–recapture abundance estimation: practical insights and lessons learned

ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2022
Verena M Trenkel, Pascal Lorance, Mark V Bravington   +2 more
exaly  

Including close-kin mark-recapture data in statistical catch-at-age stock assessments and management strategies

Fisheries Research
Paul Burch, Pia Bessell-Browne, L Richard Little   +2 more
exaly  

Close-Kin Mark-Recapture Without Age Information: Application to Southern Right Whales

Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics
Hans J Skaug, Luis A Pastene, Skaug Hans J   +2 more
exaly  

Sources of bias in applying close‐kin mark–recapture to terrestrial game species with different life histories

Ecology
Anthony Seveque, Robert C Lonsinger, Tyler R Petroelje   +2 more
exaly  

Review of Methods for Sampling Fish in Structured Habitats

Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture
Nathan M Bacheler
exaly  

Expected improvements in precision when integrating opportunistic close-kin mark-recapture data into fisheries stock assessments

Fisheries Research
exaly