Results 211 to 220 of about 3,839 (265)

For and Against Clemency

open access: yes, 2017
Clemency tends to make philosophers of punishment uncomfortable, whatever their predilections. For retributivists it is problematic because it threatens equality of treatment and introduces disproportionality. For utilitarians it is problematic because it involves a departure from what would best serve society. A mandatory sentence for murder moves the
Ian O'Donnell
exaly   +3 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Classifying Clemency

2017
‘Clemency’ refers to a reduction, by politicians, in the severity of punishments lawfully imposed by judges. It includes reprieve, commutation, remission, pardon, and amnesty. A considerable amount can be learned from the primary sources about the attributes of those to whom clemency was shown and how they differed from those who were executed in terms
exaly   +2 more sources

Clemency

2022
This chapter offers a brief institutional history of McCloy’s 1950 Advisory Board on Clemency for German War Criminals as a case study in how the best of intentions and hopes for “American Justice” could succumb to muddled bureaucratic mandates, questionable operating procedures, and a flawed understanding of the law that blurred the lines between an ...
  +4 more sources

Clemency 2.0

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
A trope heard throughout criminal justice circles today is that the system is a dystopia. Although most of the discussion and proposed remedies have centered on sentencing or release, this article focuses on clemency, which has become a controversial subject.
openaire   +1 more source

President Trump's Clemency Record: Extraordinary or Just Ordinary?

Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2022
Jeffrey Crouch
exaly  

Executive Clemency

2020
Daniel Pascoe, Andrew Novak
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy