Results 1 to 10 of about 288,440 (177)
Analysis of co-authorship networks among Brazilian graduate programs in computer science. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2022 The growth and popularization of platforms on scientific production has been the subject of several studies, producing relevant analyses of co-authorship behavior among groups of researchers.
Alex Nunes da Silva +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Network effects on scientific collaborations. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2013 BACKGROUND: The analysis of co-authorship network aims at exploring the impact of network structure on the outcome of scientific collaborations and research publications.
Shahadat Uddin +2 more
doaj +5 more sources
Co-authorship networks in Swiss political research [PDF]
Swiss Political Science Review, 2015 Co-authorship is an important indicator of scientific collaboration. Co-authorship networks are composed of sub-communities, and researchers can gain visibility by connecting these insulated subgroups.
Ingold, Karin, Leifeld, Philip
core +4 more sources
Perceptions of Scholars in the Field of Economics on Co-Authorship Associations: Evidence from an International Survey. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2016 Scholars (n = 580) from 69 countries who had contributed articles in the field of Economics during the year 2015 participated in a survey that gauged their perceptions of various aspects of co-authorship, including its benefits, motivations, working ...
Sameer Kumar, Kuru Ratnavelu
doaj +2 more sources
The stability of co-authorship structures. [PDF]
Scientometrics, 2016 AbstractThis article examines the structure of co-authorship networks’ stability in time. The goal of the article is to analyse differences in the stability and size of groups of researchers that co-author with each other (core research groups) formed in disciplines from the natural and technical sciences on one hand and the social sciences and ...
Cugmas M, Ferligoj A, Kronegger L.
europepmc +5 more sources
Authorship, Co-Authorship and Collaboration
Journal of Early Modern Studies, 2016 Journal of Early Modern Studies, Vol 5 (2016)
doaj +2 more sources
Predicting co-author relationship in medical co-authorship networks. [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2014 Research collaborations are encouraged because a synergistic effect yielding good results often appears. However, creating and organizing a strong research group is a difficult task.
Qi Yu +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2021 Background Since the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic, there have been many reports of increased incidence of venous thromboembolism and arterial events as a complication.
Marcelo G. Vallone MD +9 more
doaj +1 more source
IEEE Access, 2023 The co-authorship recommendation problem is attractive since it helps researchers extend collaboration to improve the quality of scientific articles as well as promote innovation.
Vo Duc Quang +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Alphabetized Co-Authorship in Economics Reconsidered [PDF]
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021 AbstractIn this article, we revisit the analysis of Laband and Tollison (Appl Econ 38(14):1649–1653, 2006) who documented that articles with two authors in alphabetical order are cited much more often than non-alphabetized papers with two authors in the American Economic Review and the American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Using more than 120,000
Klaus Wohlrabe, Lutz Bornmann
openaire +2 more sources