Cochrane library - Open Access .click

Results 11 to 20 of about 1,712,853 (285)

A re-analysis of the Cochrane Library data: the dangers of unobserved heterogeneity in meta-analyses.

PLoS ONE, 2013
BackgroundHeterogeneity has a key role in meta-analysis methods and can greatly affect conclusions. However, true levels of heterogeneity are unknown and often researchers assume homogeneity.
Evangelos Kontopantelis, David A Springate, David Reeves +2 more
doaj +4 more sources

From The Cochrane Library [PDF]

Medical Journal of Australia, 2013
Steve McDonald
semanticscholar +16 more sources

Find duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in systematic review. [PDF]

PLoS ONE, 2013
BACKGROUND: Finding duplicates is an important phase of systematic review. However, no consensus regarding the methods to find duplicates has been provided. This study aims to describe a pragmatic strategy of combining auto- and hand-searching duplicates
Xingshun Qi +6 more
doaj +3 more sources

Selections from the Cochrane Library

Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 2012
NA
Phil J. Wiffen, Maha Al-Khaduri, Khadra Galaa +2 more
doaj +4 more sources

From the Cochrane Library: Interventions for Pityriasis Rosea [PDF]

JMIR Dermatology, 2023

Alejandra Méndez, Carly Stevens, Andrea Murina +2 more
doaj +2 more sources

Cochrane Library feedback [PDF]

Injury Prevention, 2005
One of the potentially most useful features of the Cochrane Library is the “Add/View Feedback” link positioned (alas, not very conspicuously) towards the bottom of the menu that appears each time a review (or a protocol for a review) is selected. Users of the Library can leave their own comments or criticisms and see what others might have said.
Paul Chinnock
openalex +3 more sources

From the Cochrane Library: Interventions for Acne Scars [PDF]