Results 211 to 220 of about 14,362 (242)
Ambulatory Free Medial Femoral Condyle and Trochlea Flaps for Management of Scaphoid Fractures and Nonunions. [PDF]
Sarac BA, Awan HM, Schmucker RW.
europepmc +1 more source
A comparative study of modified performance based plastic design methods for seismic design of RC frames: improvement over existing methods. [PDF]
Vyas R +10 more
europepmc +1 more source
Paleopathology Meets Public Health: Deep-Time Syndemics and the Ecology of Emerging Infections. [PDF]
Bahmad HF +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
Hydroxyl radical production in liquid water by laser cavitation. [PDF]
Zhou X, Gu J.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
The New Collapse Argument against Quantifier Variance
Monist, The, 2023AbstractQuantifier variantists accept multiple alternative ontological languages in which quantifiers obey the usual inference rules despite having different meanings. But collapse arguments seem to show that these quantifiers would be provably equivalent to one another.
Theodore Sider, Sider Theodore
exaly +2 more sources
Plural Grounding and Redundancy Elimination: A Defence of the Modal Collapse Argument
AnalysisAbstract Van Inwagen argued that the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) implies necessitarianism, i.e., that all truths are necessary truths. Schnieder and Steinberg showed that van Inwagen’s argument fails if we apply a notion of plural grounding to the discussion of the PSR: the conjunction of all contingent truths is fully ...
Jasper Lohmar
exaly +2 more sources
Another Failed Modal Collapse Argument
AnalysisAbstract The doctrine of divine simplicity says that God is not composed of parts (physical or metaphysical). Modal collapse arguments aim to show that the necessary co-existence of God and creation follows from the doctrine. As noted by Christopher Tomaszewski, R. T.
exaly +2 more sources
From Collapse Theorems to Proof-Theoretic Arguments
The Australasian Journal of Logic, 2023On some views, we can be sure that parties to a dispute over the logic of `exists' are not talking past each other if they can characterise `exists' as the only monadic predicate up to logical equivalence obeying a certain set of rules of inference. Otherwise, we ought to be suspicious about the reality of their disagreement.
openaire +1 more source
Philosophical Studies, 2017
We can divide philosophical theories of consciousness into two main camps: First-Order theories and Higher-Order theories. Like all Higher-Order theories, many First-Order theories are mentalistic theories of consciousness: they attempt to reduce a mental state’s being consciousness using mental (but non-phenomenal) terms, such as being available to ...
openaire +1 more source
We can divide philosophical theories of consciousness into two main camps: First-Order theories and Higher-Order theories. Like all Higher-Order theories, many First-Order theories are mentalistic theories of consciousness: they attempt to reduce a mental state’s being consciousness using mental (but non-phenomenal) terms, such as being available to ...
openaire +1 more source

