Results 71 to 80 of about 111 (101)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Dual continuous modules over commutative noetherian rings
Communications in Algebra, 1988Bruno J Müller
exaly +2 more sources
t-Structures and cotilting modules over commutative noetherian rings
Mathematische Zeitschrift, 2014Let \(R\) be a commutative noetherian ring. The authors present a unified approach to several recent classification results over \(R\): -- the classification of compactly generated \(t\)-structures in the unbounded derived category \(\mathcal{D}(R)\) given by \textit{L. Alonso Tarrío} et al. [J. Algebra 324, No.
ANGELERI, LIDIA, M. Saorin
openaire +3 more sources
Commutative Noetherian local rings whose ideals are direct sums of cyclic modules
This paper is about to find which properties of the (sub-) category of \(R\)-modules reflect the structure of \(R\), where throughout \(R\) is a commutative ring with unit and any module is unital. For a recent work in the same direction see [\textit{R. Takahashi}, ``When is there a nontrivial extension-closed subcategory?'', J. Algebra 331, No. 1, 388-
M Behboodi +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
SUPERDECOMPOSABLE PURE INJECTIVE MODULES OVER COMMUTATIVE NOETHERIAN RINGS
Journal of Algebra and Its Applications, 2008We investigate width and Krull–Gabriel dimension over commutative Noetherian rings which are "tame" according to the Klingler–Levy analysis in [4–6], in particular over Dedekind-like rings and their homomorphic images. We show that both are undefined in most cases.
PUNINSKAYA V., TOFFALORI, Carlo
openaire +3 more sources
Communications in Algebra, 2016
We introduce and study the concept of dual perfect dimension which is a Krull-like dimension extension of the concept of acc on finitely generated submodules. We observe some basic facts for modules with this dimension, which are similar to the basic properties of modules with Noetherian dimension.
O A S Karamzadeh
exaly +2 more sources
We introduce and study the concept of dual perfect dimension which is a Krull-like dimension extension of the concept of acc on finitely generated submodules. We observe some basic facts for modules with this dimension, which are similar to the basic properties of modules with Noetherian dimension.
O A S Karamzadeh
exaly +2 more sources
Gorenstein dimension and torsion of modules over commutative noetherian rings
Communications in Algebra, 2000exaly +2 more sources
Mathematische Annalen, 2007
Let \(A\) be a commutative noetherian ring. The support of a complex of \(A\)-modules is compared to the support of its cohomology. As a consequence the author classifies the full subcategories of \(A\)-modules that are thick (i.e. closed under taking kernels, cokernels and extensions) and closed under taking arbitrary direct sums.
Henning Krause
exaly +4 more sources
Let \(A\) be a commutative noetherian ring. The support of a complex of \(A\)-modules is compared to the support of its cohomology. As a consequence the author classifies the full subcategories of \(A\)-modules that are thick (i.e. closed under taking kernels, cokernels and extensions) and closed under taking arbitrary direct sums.
Henning Krause
exaly +4 more sources
Big pure projective modules over commutative noetherian rings: Comparison with the completion
Abstract A module over a ring R is pure projective provided it is isomorphic to a direct summand of a direct sum of finitely presented modules. We develop tools for the classification of pure projective modules over commutative noetherian rings. In particular, for a fixed finitely presented module M, we consider
Dolors Herbera +2 more
exaly +4 more sources
UA-properties of modules over commutative Noetherian rings
Russian Mathematics, 2016zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Lyubimtsev, Oleg V., Chistyakov, D. S.
openaire +2 more sources
Forcing linearity numbers of semicyclic modules over commutative Noetherian rings
Abhandlungen Aus Dem Mathematischen Seminar Der Universitat Hamburg, 2003Given a module \(V\) over a commutative ring \(R\), a function \(f:V\rightarrow V\) is said to be ``homogeneous'' if \(f(rv) = rf(v)\) for all \(r\in R\) and all \(v\in V\) and \(M_R(V)\) denotes the set of all such functions. Clearly \(M_R(V)\) is contained in \(\text{End}_R(V)\), the set of module endomorphisms on \(V\). This paper looks at how close
exaly +3 more sources

