Results 21 to 30 of about 32,501,069 (287)

Boxer: Interactive Comparison of Classifier Results [PDF]

Computer Graphics Forum, 2020
AbstractMachine learning practitioners often compare the results of different classifiers to help select, diagnose and tune models. We present Boxer, a system to enable such comparison. Our system facilitates interactive exploration of the experimental results obtained by applying multiple classifiers to a common set of model inputs.
Michael Gleicher, Aditya Barve, Xinyi Yu, Florian Heimerl   +3 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Is it Possible to Compare USE and SFA: A Comparison of Indicators Calculated on the Basis of Different Tests

Вопросы образования, 2014
The article discusses the possibilities of different tests results comparisons. The issue of correct compare of different tests results raises in relation of analysis of tests results for different years and in a number of other cases.
Mark Agranovich
doaj   +1 more source

Comparison results for capacity [PDF]

Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 2012
Final version. To appear in Indiana Univ.
Hurtado, Ana, Palmer Andreu, Vicente, Ritoré, Manuel   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Results of the regional key comparison EUROMET.M.P-K1.a in the pressure range from 0.1 Pa to 1000 Pa

, 2005
Within EUROMET a regional key comparison (EUROMET.M.P-K1.a) was performed in order to compare national vacuum standards in the pressure range from 0.1 Pa to 1000 Pa.
Szaulich, D., Kangi, R., Jousten, K., Legras, J. C., Karl Jousten, John Greenwood, Calcatelli, A., Arrhén, Fredrik,, Greenwood, J., Verbeek, J., Jos Verbeek, Carmen Matilla Vicente, Rifat Kangi, BERGOGLIO, MERCEDE, Bergoglio, M., Jean Claude Legras, Anita Calcatelli, Markuu Rantanen, Fredrik Arrhen, Denes Szaulich, Rantanen, M., Vicente, C. M.   +21 more
core   +1 more source

The International Urban Energy Balance Models Comparison Project: First Results from Phase 1 [PDF]

, 2010
A large number of urban surface energy balance models now exist with different assumptions about the important features of the surface and exchange processes that need to be incorporated.
Best, MJ, Bohnenstengel, S. I., Steeneveld, G. -J., Baik, J. J., Salamanca, F., Hamdi, R, Steeneveld, G. J., Kondo, H, Salamaca, F, Kawai, Tadashi, Hamdi, R., Voogt, J, Baik, J-J., Hendry, M., Blackett, M, Kawamoto, Y, Loridan, T, Voogt, J., Grimmond, C. S. B., Dandou, A, Fortuniak, K, Oleson, K., Calmet, I., Baik, JJ, Belcher, S.E., Best, M. J., Belcher, SE, Zhangt, N., Martilli, A., Steeneveld, G.J., Fortuniak, K., Ryu, Y-H., Loridan, T., ,, Pigeon, Grégoire, Grimmond, C.S.B., Barlow, J, Grimmond, CSB, Kawai, T., KRAYENHOFF, E.S., Calmet I, BOHNENSTENGEL, S.I., Blackett, M., Dandou, A., Bohnenstengel, SI, Pigeon, G, Baik, J., Lee, S.H., Ryu, Y. -H., Krayenhoff, ES, Kondo, H., Ryu, Y. H., Steeneveld, GL, Gouvea, ML, Shashua-Bar, L., Miao, S, RYU, YOUNG HEE, Gouvea, M. L., Miao, S., Martilli, A, Belcher, S. E., Young, D., Baik, J. -J., Tombrou, M, BEST, M.J., Barlow, J., Blackett, Matthew; id_orcid, Grimmond, C. S.B., Young, D, Hendry, M, Masson, V., Zhang, N., Kawai, T, Kawamoto, Y., Masson, Valéry, Lee, S. -H., Porson, A., Chen, F, Lee, SH, Steeneveld, G-J., Shashua-Bar, L, GOUVEA, M.L., Krayenhoff, E. S., Ryu, Y.-H., Pigeon, G., Best, M., BAIK, J.J., Masson, V, Tombrou, M., Oleson, K, Lee, S. H., Chen, F., Porson, A, Lee, S-H., Zhang, N, KRAYENHOFF, S., TROMBOU, M., GRIMMOND, C., LEE, S., PORSON, A.,, STEEVEVELD, G., ZGANG, N, GOUVEA, M., BOHNENSTENGEL, S., PIEGEON, G.   +104 more
core   +1 more source

Comparison results and linearized oscillations for higher-order difference equations

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 1992
Consider the difference equationsΔmxn+(−1)m+1pnf(xn−k)=0,   n=0,1,…        (1)andΔmyn+(−1)m+1qng(yn−ℓ)=0,   n=0,1,….       (2)We establish a comparison result according to which, when m is odd, every solution of Eq.(1) oscillates provided that every ...
G. Ladas, C. Qian
doaj   +1 more source

The results of CCM.G-K2.2017 key comparison [PDF]

Metrologia, 2020
The CCM.G-K2.2017 comparison was organised for the purpose of determination of the degree of equivalence of the national standards for free-fall acceleration measurement. The comparison was held in the Changping Campus of National Institute of Metrology China (NIM), from October to November in 2017.
Wu, S., Feng, J., Li, C., Su, D., Wang, Q., Hu, R., Hu, L., Xu, L., Ji, Wangxi, Ullrich, Christian, Pálinkás Pecný, Vojtech, Kostelecký, J., Bilker-Koivula, M., Näränen, Jyri, Merlet, Sébastien, Le Moigne, Nicolas, Mizushima, Shigeki, Francis, Olivier, Choi, In-Mook, Kim, Min-Seok, Alotaibi, H M, Aljuwayr, A., Baumann, Henri, Priruenrom, T., Woradet, N., Kirbas, C., Coskun, I., Newel, S.   +27 more
openaire   +4 more sources

The assessment of the integration methods for the rail vehicle ride dynamics solution

MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018
The article is devoted to the analysis of the dynamic characteristics of the mechanical system composed of rigid bodies mutually connected with flexible bindings that represent springs and dampers.
Lack Tomáš, Gerlici Juraj
doaj   +1 more source

Enzym Methods in Wine Analysis

International Journal of Horticultural Science, 2001
In our laboratory for special determinations BOERINGER-MANNHEIM's enzyme-test combinations have been used for 10 years. Our present work deals with the practical aspects of the enzymatic determination of so important wine components like L-malic, L ...
M. Kállay, Gy. Bárdi, K. Korány
doaj   +1 more source

A Comparison between Results of Compaction for Soil [PDF]

Engineering and Technology Journal, 2013
Compaction test is one of the important laboratory tests to determine the soil characteristic properties , as well as standard penetration test is the standard field test for identifying many properties of the soil of which are confined compressive ...
Husam Hikmat Baqir
doaj   +1 more source