Journalistic Ethics and Standards in the Spanish Constitution and National Codes of Conduct from the Perspective of Andalusian Journalism Students [PDF]
Global Media Journal: Canadian Edition, 2013 This paper focuses on the opinion held by journalism students of the Faculty of Communication of Seville University about the ethical standards set out in the Spanish Constitution (Article 20.1.d) and the country’s codes of conduct. The aim of this paper
María Ángeles López-Hernández +1 more
doaj
Medycyna a religia Czy lekarz ma prawo dawania świadectwa wiary?
Fides et Ratio, 2017 The debate on freedom of conscience has a particular importance. It refers to a unique law. It concerns to possibility of freely presenting own and essential beliefs.
Błażej Kmieciak
doaj
Fred Zacharias’s Skeptical Moralism [PDF]
, 2011 Fred Zacharias\u27s articles, Rethinking Confidentiality, published in two parts, were a sensational start to an illustrious career. Fred conducted the first and one of the best empirical studies of confidentiality in years, surveying lawyers and clients
Luban, David
core +1 more source
Constitutional Legitimacy [PDF]
, 2003 The problem of constitutional legitimacy is to establish why anyone should obey the command of a constitutionally-valid law. A lawmaking system is legitimate if there is a prima facie duty to obey the laws it makes. Neither consent of the governed nor
Barnett, Randy E.
core +1 more source
Studia Koszalińsko-KołobrzeskieAfter World War II, the communist security apparatus blackmailed, persecuted and murdered priests who resisted the government. In every political trial against Polish citizens, some priest or other clergyman sat on the defendants’ behalf. In addition to
Dariusz Śmierzchalski-Wachocz
doaj +1 more source
Finding the Original Meaning of American Criminal Procedure Rights: Lessons from Reasonable Doubt’s Development [PDF]
, 2012 [Excerpt] “The prosecution must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt for a valid conviction. The Constitution nowhere explicitly contains this requirement, but the Supreme Court in In re Winship1 stated that due process commands it.
Jonakait, Randolph N.
core +2 more sources
The Physician’s Conscience, Conscience Clauses, and Religious Belief:
This Essay explores how physicians may handle conflicts or conscience facing Roman Catholic Health practitioners regarding "human life" issues, especially through conscience clauses. In five parts, the author examines "first, why conscientious objection is so important in our day; second, the moral grounding for freedom in the exercise of conscience ...
openaire +3 more sources
Keeping Schools Safe: Why Schools Should Have an Affirmative Duty to Protect Students from Harm by Other Students [PDF]
, 2004 [Excerpt] Federal statutes have attempted to make schools safer by providing grants to assist schools in becoming violence-free. Similarly, some states have passed “bullying laws,” which mandate procedures for school officials to follow when dealing ...
Bethel, Alison
core +1 more source
Neutrality, Proselytism and Religious Minorities at the European Court of Human Rights and the US Supreme Court [PDF]
, 2009 The paper examines the way the US Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights have dealt with the discriminatory treatment of religious minorities in relation to proselytism, and the role played by the principle of neutrality in arguments ...
Hatzis, N.
core
Who Owns the Soul of the Child?: An Essay on Religious Parenting Rights and the Enfranchisement of the Child [PDF]
, 2012 At common law, and (for most of the nation\u27s history) under state statutory regimes, the authority of the parent to direct the child\u27s upbringing was a matter of duty, not right, and chief among parental obligations was the duty to provide the ...
Shulman, Jeffrey
core +1 more source