Results 251 to 260 of about 4,459,490 (316)

Disentangling Boltzmann Brains, the Time-Asymmetry of Memory, and the Second Law. [PDF]

Entropy (Basel)
Wolpert D, Rovelli C, Scharnhorst J.
europepmc   +1 more source

Lost in the Edit: Reclaiming the Clinical Narrative in the Age of Synthetic Records. [PDF]

Cureus
Lakhan SE.
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The consequence argument ungrounded

Synthese, 2017
Peter van Inwagen's original formulation of the Consequence Argument employed an inference rule (rule beta) that was shown to be invalid given van Inwagen's interpretation of the modal operators in the Consequence Argument (McKay and Johnson in Philos Top 24:113-122, 1996). In response, van Inwagen (Metaphysics.
Marco Hausmann
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

Kant’s Reply to the Consequence Argument

International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2021
In this paper, I show that Kant’s solution to the third antinomy is a reply sui generis to the consequence argument.
M. Scholten
openaire   +2 more sources

Lehrer and the consequence argument

Philosophical Studies, 2012
The consequence argument of van Inwagen is widely regarded as the best argument for incompatibilism. Lewis’s response is praised by van Inwagen as the best compatibilist’s strategy but Lewis himself acknowledges that his strategy resembles that of Lehrer. A comparison will show that one can speak about Lehrer–Lewis strategy, although I think that Lewis’
Danilo Šuster
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

The Consequence argument and the Mind argument

Analysis, 2001
Van Inwagen, like many other libertarians, is convinced by the argument. But there is a problem: one of the presuppositions of the Consequence argument seems to yield a powerful argument for the incompatibility of freedom and indeterminism, an argument van Inwagen calls the Mind argument.1 It seems, then, that what many have taken to provide the most ...
D. Nelkin
openaire   +2 more sources

Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument

The Philosophical Review, 2000
In van Inwagen's view, as well as my own, the Consequence Argument is the strongest argument for incompatibilism, and, as he formulates the argument, rule beta is its weakest link.2 For this reason, it is of the utmost importance, in the debate over compatibilism, to determine whether rule beta is valid.
M. Huemer
openaire   +2 more sources

Compatibilism and the Consequence Argument

2013
In §1.4, I introduced The Consequence Argument, so-called because it trades on the fact that if determinism is true, our acts are consequences of the laws of nature plus facts about the past – that is, the laws plus the past entail that we perform them. As I said in §1.4, a very rough summary of the argument goes like this: The laws of nature and facts
H. Beebee
semanticscholar   +3 more sources

The Consequence Argument Revisited

2012
AbstractThis article surveys the most recent versions of the Consequence Argument and objections to them. It considers objections made to some of the more well-known versions of the argument and recent attempts by defenders to answer these objections by offering reformulated versions of it. Many objections involve a principle van Inwagen called “Beta,”
D. Speak
openaire   +2 more sources