Results 251 to 260 of about 1,315,168 (284)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Van Inwagen on the consequence argument

Analysis, 1992
If determinism is true, then, where p is any true proposition ascribing an action to some human agent, p is logically implied by any conjunction consisting of a proposition that expresses the laws of nature and a proposition that describes the state of the universe at some time prior to the origin of human existence.
openaire   +1 more source

A timid response to the consequence argument

Philosophical Issues, 2023
AbstractIn this paper, I challenge the Consequence Argument for Incompatibilism by arguing that the inference principle it relies upon is not well motivated. The sorts of non‐question‐begging instances that might be offered in support of it fall short.
openaire   +1 more source

A theoretical argumentation on the consequences of moral stress

Journal of Nursing Management, 2007
Intensive care units are characterized by heavy workloads, increasing work complexity and ethical concerns related to life-and-death decisions. In the present study, it is assumed that there is a relationship between moral stress, support and competence for nurses in intensive care units.To analyse and describe the theoretical relationship between ...
Agneta, Cronqvist, Maria, Nyström
openaire   +2 more sources

The irrelevance of the Consequence Argument

Analysis, 2008
It is worth noting that as van Inwagen originally formulates the doctrine of deter minism, L together with a proposition expressing the total state of the universe at a time later than now necessitate a proposition expressing the total state of the universe now (1983: 65; Campbell 2007: 106).
openaire   +1 more source

Argument and Consequence

1977
In Chapter 1, I suggested that the main theoretical barrier against analysis of concrete micro situations within the Marxian framework has been the absence of explicit consideration of class struggle, particularly struggle within productive activity. Once class struggle is incorporated fundamentally and explicitly into a Marxian framework, two types of
openaire   +1 more source

Compatibilism and the Consequence Argument

2013
In §1.4, I introduced The Consequence Argument, so-called because it trades on the fact that if determinism is true, our acts are consequences of the laws of nature plus facts about the past – that is, the laws plus the past entail that we perform them. As I said in §1.4, a very rough summary of the argument goes like this: The laws of nature and facts
openaire   +2 more sources

‘Everyone’, consequences, and generalization arguments

Inquiry, 1967
This paper addresses issues raised by recent discussion in normative ethics which concern relations between properties of individual actions and of certain groups of actions. First, an ambiguity common to ‘everyone can’ and ‘everyone ought’ is examined.
openaire   +1 more source

The Consequence Argument Revisited

2012
AbstractThis article surveys the most recent versions of the Consequence Argument and objections to them. It considers objections made to some of the more well-known versions of the argument and recent attempts by defenders to answer these objections by offering reformulated versions of it. Many objections involve a principle van Inwagen called “Beta,”
openaire   +1 more source

Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument

The Philosophical Review, 2000
In van Inwagen's view, as well as my own, the Consequence Argument is the strongest argument for incompatibilism, and, as he formulates the argument, rule beta is its weakest link.2 For this reason, it is of the utmost importance, in the debate over compatibilism, to determine whether rule beta is valid.
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy