Results 1 to 10 of about 17,676 (306)
Schizophrenia and the Virtues of Self-Effacement [PDF]
Michael Stocker’s “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories” attacks versions of consequentialism and deontological ethics on the grounds that they are self-effacing.
Barry, Paul
core +2 more sources
L’aliénation, le conséquentialisme et les exigences de la morale [PDF]
Parution originale sous le titre « Alienation, Consequentialism and the Demands of Morality » dans _Philosophy and Social Affairs_, vol. 13, No. 2 (Printemps 1984), pp. 134-171. Traduit de l’Anglais par Eric Guindon, révisé par Christine Tappolet.
Peter Railton
doaj
How Far Can We Go with Deliberative Research at Dangerous Places?
This paper reflects on several past research projects that required convening deliberative discussions in dangerous places. It raises questions about the safety of participants, collaboration with government agencies, and working within the constraints ...
Jürg Steiner
doaj +2 more sources
Non-consequentialism and Political Philosophy
Robert Nozick has shown in which ways the theory of natural law (in John Locke, for instance) can be invoked to defend a libertarian theory of State. This paper suggests that Nozick does not prove that invoking natural rights may be a proof against the ...
Philip Pettit
doaj
Consequentialism and Non-Consequentialism: The Axiomatic Approach [PDF]
Most, if not at all, practitioners of welfare economics and social choice theory are presumed to be welfaristic in their conviction. Indeed, they evaluate the goodness of an economic policy and/or economic system in terms of the welfare that people receive at the culmination outcomes thereby generated.
Suzumura, Kotaro, Xu, Yongsheng
openaire +2 more sources
Beyond Beneficence: Moral Asymmetry and the Minimization of Suffering in End-of-Life Care
This paper critically examines the ethical foundations for minimizing suffering at the end of life. The reduction of suffering is a major concern in the ethical discourse of end-of-life care.
Adam Braus
doaj +1 more source
¿Puede la tortura estar moralmente justificada en algún caso?
Based on the distinction between moral and legal judgments, the author supports the thesis that torture, in some cases, can be morally permissible.
Juan Antonio García Amado
doaj +1 more source
Clifford and the Common Epistemic Norm [PDF]
This paper develops a “Cliffordian” argument for a common epistemic norm governing belief, action, and assertion. The idea is that beliefs are the sorts of things that lead to actions and assertions. What each of us believes influences what we act on and
McKenna, Robin
core +1 more source
Stanford University, Philosophy, 1970, A.B. London School of Economics and Political Science, Politics, 1976, Ph.D.https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/erfa_bios/1269/thumbnail ...
San Jose State University
core +1 more source
Preference and Prevention: A New Paradox of Deontology
It’s commonly thought that we can reasonably oppose serious wrongdoing. For example, deontologist bystanders may prefer that an agent allows the killing of five rather than wrongly killing one as a means to saving the five.
Richard Yetter Chappell
doaj +2 more sources

