Results 261 to 270 of about 17,676 (306)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

The “Consequentialism” in “Epistemic Consequentialism”

2018
Driver compares ethical and epistemic consequentialism in order to get clearer on the latter’s view on the relationship between the epistemic right and the epistemic good. She notes that the process reliabilist is a kind of epistemic consequentialist that is able to avoid a number of objections to consequentialism adapted from the ethical literature ...
openaire   +1 more source

Consequentialism and non-consequentialism

2018
In the academic field of business ethics, few would claim to be consequentialists, and, in fact, most find consequentialism in tension with ethics not a source of it, in part because consequentialism is often associated with a focus on either happiness or utility—oftentimes economic—rather than ethical values.
openaire   +1 more source

Consequentializing

Philosophy Compass, 2009
Abstract A growing trend of thought has it that any plausible nonconsequentialist theory can be consequentialized, which is to say that it can be given a consequentialist representation. In this essay, I explore both whether this claim is true and what its implications are.
openaire   +1 more source

ConsequentIalizing

2020
AbstractThe strategy of consequentializing features that are intuitively relevant to the deontic evaluation of actions by building them into the telic evaluation of outcomes is almost as old as consequentialism itself. But the recent rejection by many consequentialists of the traditional commitment to an agent-neutral constraint on the relevant ...
openaire   +1 more source

Consequentialism

2019
Consequentialism can be defined as an instrumentalist approach to ethics that consists in evaluating a given system through its resulting effects (Pettit 2003; Anscombe 2005; Blackburn 2008), i.e., through the maximization of gains and the minimization of losses it enables (Baggini and Fosl 2007).Several forms of consequentialism can be identified ...
openaire   +3 more sources

CHAPTER 14 Consequentialism and Non‐Consequentialism

2009
Abstract Most, if not all, practitioners of welfare economics and social choice theory are presumed to be welfaristic in their conviction. Indeed, they evaluate the goodness of an economic policy and/or economic system in terms of the welfare that people receive at the culmination outcomes thereby generated. Recent years have witnessed a
Kotaro Suzumura, Yongsheng Xu
openaire   +1 more source

MULTI‐DIMENSIONAL CONSEQUENTIALISM

Ratio, 2012
AbstractThis article introduces and explores a distinction between multi‐dimensional and one‐dimensional consequentialist moral theories. One‐dimensional consequentialists believe that an act's deontic status depends on just one aspect of the act, such as the sum total of wellbeing it produces, or the sum total of priority‐ or equality‐adjusted ...
openaire   +1 more source

Consequentialism

2000
AbstractConsequentialist, and in particular, utilitarian theories of punishment hold that punishment is justified by its consequences. This chapter considers classic and contemporary statements of this position and argues that whilst consequentialism captures an important truth about punishment—that punishment has something to do with securing a better
openaire   +1 more source

Consequentialism

Abstract The consequentialist view of punishment such as, in particular, the utilitarian theory, has constituted the dominant approach to punishment for almost two centuries. However, the theory has very few advocates in modern considerations of punishment.
openaire   +1 more source

Consequential Omnibenevolence

Grazer Philosophische Studien, 1994
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy