Results 151 to 160 of about 766 (177)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

The prospects for consociational democracy in South Africa

The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 1989
(1989). The prospects for consociational democracy in South Africa. The Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics: Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 3-22.
John McGarry, S.J.R. Noel
openaire   +1 more source

Power-sharing and ‘consociational democracy’ in South Tyrol

GeoJournal, 1997
Consociational democracy is often proposed as a non-territorial strategy to accommodate tensions between ethnic groups in the framework of a democratic regime. The multi-ethnic province of South Tyrol (Alto Adige) in Northern Italy is presented as an example of a regional ethnic conflict solved by the application of a consociational strategy.
openaire   +2 more sources

FEATURES OF LEBANESE “CONSOCIAL DEMOCRACY”

History of Science
As is well known, Lebanon’s consociational model is designed to bring stability to the country. The model is currently alleged to have caused serious political problems: ‒ Political paralysis: Mutual veto power often leads to government blockage, making it difficult to implement reforms or effectively resolve crises.
openaire   +1 more source

The Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation

American Political Science Review, 1996
India has been the one major deviant case for consociational (power-sharing) theory, and its sheer size makes the exception especially damaging. A deeply divided society with, supposedly, a mainly majoritarian type of democracy, India nevertheless has been able to maintain its democratic system.
openaire   +1 more source

South African democracy: Majoritarian or consociational?

Democratization, 1998
(1998). South African democracy: Majoritarian or consociational? Democratization: Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 144-150.
openaire   +1 more source

Review and Critique of the Literature on Consociational Democracy

2009
It has always been rather assumed that socio-cultural homogeneity and majoritarian consensus are the main pillars upon which democracy could develop and consolidate its foundations. Yet, in the 1960s, political scientists strongly challenged these views and elaborated comparable types that helped explain stability in fragmented cultures.
openaire   +1 more source

Democracy, ethnoicracy and consociational demoicracy

International Political Science Review, 2020
Nenad Stojanović
exaly  

Review Article: Political Accommodation and Consociational Democracy

British Journal of Political Science, 1975
Brian Barry
exaly  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy