Results 21 to 30 of about 53 (47)

Does it matter how we measure conspiracy beliefs? A test of three measurement approaches

open access: yesSocial Science Quarterly, Volume 106, Issue 1, January 2025.
Abstract Objectives In this article, we examine the extent to which respondents’ support for conspiratorial claims depends on question format. Measuring conspiracy theory beliefs in the general population is challenging, and properly capturing these beliefs is necessary if we are to understand them.
Feodor Snagovsky, Daniel Stockemer
wiley   +1 more source

Prejudice is epistemically unwarranted belief

open access: yesApplied Cognitive Psychology, Volume 38, Issue 3, May/June 2024.
Abstract In two preregistered online studies with U.S. adults, we provide evidence of a common psychological profile characterizing belief in prejudicial and non‐prejudicial epistemically unwarranted claims. We solicited self‐report ratings of beliefs in prejudicial and non‐prejudicial pseudoscientific, conspiratorial, and paranormal claims, as well as
Emilio Jon Christopher Lobato   +1 more
wiley   +1 more source

RPC-Lex: A dictionary to measure German right-wing populist conspiracy discourse online. [PDF]

open access: yesConvergence (Lond), 2022
Puschmann C   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The generic conspiracist beliefs scale – 5: A short-form measure of conspiracist ideation

Journal of Research in Personality, 2023
Cameron S Kay, Paul Slovic
exaly  

The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale-5: further psychometric evaluation using a United Kingdom-based sample

Frontiers in Psychology, 2023
Alex Escolà-Gascón   +2 more
exaly  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy