Results 21 to 30 of about 53 (47)
Does it matter how we measure conspiracy beliefs? A test of three measurement approaches
Abstract Objectives In this article, we examine the extent to which respondents’ support for conspiratorial claims depends on question format. Measuring conspiracy theory beliefs in the general population is challenging, and properly capturing these beliefs is necessary if we are to understand them.
Feodor Snagovsky, Daniel Stockemer
wiley +1 more source
Prejudice is epistemically unwarranted belief
Abstract In two preregistered online studies with U.S. adults, we provide evidence of a common psychological profile characterizing belief in prejudicial and non‐prejudicial epistemically unwarranted claims. We solicited self‐report ratings of beliefs in prejudicial and non‐prejudicial pseudoscientific, conspiratorial, and paranormal claims, as well as
Emilio Jon Christopher Lobato +1 more
wiley +1 more source
RPC-Lex: A dictionary to measure German right-wing populist conspiracy discourse online. [PDF]
Puschmann C +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
"Trust me, do not trust anyone": how epistemic mistrust and credulity are associated with conspiracy mentality. [PDF]
Brauner F +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Both a bioweapon and a hoax: The curious case of contradictory conspiracy theories about COVID-19
Zezelj I, Petrović M.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
The generic conspiracist beliefs scale – 5: A short-form measure of conspiracist ideation
Journal of Research in Personality, 2023Cameron S Kay, Paul Slovic
exaly

